基于隐私度和稳定度的D2D数据共享伙伴选择机制

doi:10.11959/j.issn.2096-109x.2019060

Abstract

Abstract:

Device to device (D2D) data sharing has become a promising solution to offload cellular network traffic,but the privacy vulnerability and service instability of data sharing partners affect the quality of shared services.To solve this problem,a D2D data sharing partner selection mechanism based on degree of privacy degree and stability degree (named PSUS) was proposed.Firstly,the privacy information of the provider was abstracted and summarized,and the privacy measurement method was built according to the privacy preferences of the provider and the historical records of shared services,and the privacy degree of the provider in different shared services was obtained.Then,the data sharing process was designed based on privacy degree,and the provider cached data under the constraints of privacy preferences and participates in sharing services with low privacy to meet the provider's privacy requirements.Finally,on the basis of the provider who has satisfied the privacy requirements,a multi-index evaluation method was designed to evaluate the service stability of providers to select stable sharing partners.The feasibility of the proposed mechanism was demonstrated by analysis of performance.

Key words: D2D data sharing, privacy preference, privacy metric, multi-index evaluation

CLC Number:

TP393

Zhangjian HUANG,Guohua YE,Zhiqiang YAO. D2D data sharing partner selection mechanism based on privacy degree and stability degree[J]. Chinese Journal of Network and Information Security, 2019, 5(6): 31-41.

Figures/Tables 9

References 22

[1]	PEDHADIYA M K , JHA R K , BHATT H G . Device to device communication:A survey[J]. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2019,129: 71-89.
[2]	WU D , ZHOU L , CAI Y . Social-aware rate based content sharing mode selection for D2D content sharing scenarios[J]. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2017,19(11): 2571-2582.
[3]	JIANG J , ZHANG S , LI B ,et al. Maximized cellular traffic offloading via device-to-device content sharing[J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2016,34(1): 82-91.
[4]	MILITANO L , ARANITI G , CONDOLUCI M ,et al. Device-to-device communications for 5G internet of things[J]. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things, 2015,15(1): 1-15.
[5]	ZHANG A , CHEN J , HU R Q ,et al. SeDS:secure data sharing strategy for D2D communication in LTE-advanced networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2016,65(4): 2659-2672.
[6]	YU T , ZHOU Z , ZHANG D ,et al. Indapson:an incentive data plan sharing system based on self-organizing network[C]// IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. 2014: 1545-1553.
[7]	HE J Z , WANG H B , ZHANG T . Incentive and selection for D2D content sharing:a comprehensive scoring mechanism[C]// 2016 IEEE 13th International Conference on Signal Processing (ICSP). 2016: 1208-1213.
[8]	ZHOU R F , HWANG K . PowerTrust:a robust and scalable reputation system for trusted peer-to-peer computing[C]// IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems. 2007: 460-473.
[9]	华佳烽, 李凤华, 郭云川 ,等. 信息交换过程中的隐私保护技术研究[J]. 网络与信息安全学报, 2016,2(3): 28-38.
	HUA J W , LI F H , GUO Y C ,et al. Research on privacy protection technology in information exchange process[J]. Journal of Network and Information Security, 2016,2(3): 28-38.
[10]	WISHART R , HENRICKSEN K , INDULSKA J . Context privacy and obfuscation supported by dynamic context source discovery and processing in a context management system[C]// International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing. 2007: 929-940.
[11]	FRANZ E , SPRINGER T , HARDER N . Enhancing privacy in social applications with the notion of group context[C]// 2012 International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions. 2012: 112-118.
[12]	WANG M , YAN Z . Privacy-preserving authentication and key agreement protocols for D2D group communications[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2018,14(8): 3637-3647.
[13]	MOHSENI-EJIYEH A , ASHOURI-TALOUKI M , MAHDAVI M . A lightweight and secure data sharing protocol for D2D communications[C]// 2017 14th International ISC (Iranian Society of Cryptology) Conference on Information Security and Cryptology (ISCISC). 2017: 42-47.
[14]	ZHANG A , WANG L , YE X ,et al. Light-weight and robust security-aware D2D-assist data transmission protocol for mobile-health systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2017,12(3): 662-675.
[15]	YAN J , WU D , WANG R . Socially aware trust framework for multimedia delivery in D2D cooperative communication[J]. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2019,21(3): 625-635.
[16]	HE J , WANG H , CHU X ,et al. Incentive mechanism and content provider selection for device-to-device-based content sharing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2019.
[17]	JAMEEL F , HAMID Z , JABEEN F ,et al. A survey of device-to-device communications:research issues and challenges[J]. IEEE Communications Surveys ＆ Tutorials, 2018,20(3): 2133-2168.
[18]	JENSEN C D , KORSGAARD T R . Dynamics of trust evolution:auto-configuration of dispositional trust dynamics[C]// International Conference on Security and Cryptography. 2008: 509-517.
[19]	BAI B , WANG L , HAN Z ,et al. Caching based socially-aware D2D communications in wireless content delivery networks:a hypergraph framework[J]. IEEE Wireless Communications, 2016,23(4): 74-81.
[20]	JING L , NG M K , HUANG J Z . An entropy weighting k-means algorithm for subspace clustering of high-dimensional sparse data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge ＆ Data Engineering, 2007(8): 1026-1041.
[21]	张近乐, 任杰 . 熵理论中熵及熵权计算式的不足与修正[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2011,26(1): 3-5.
	ZHANG J L , REN J . The deficiencies and amendments of the calculation formulate of entropy and entropy weight in the theory of entropy[J]. Statistics ＆ Information Forum, 2011,26(1): 3-5.
[22]	JIN B , JIANG D , XIONG J ,et al. D2D data privacy protection mechanism based on reliability and homomorphic encryption[J]. IEEE Access, 2018,6: 51140-51150.

Metrics

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

提供者数目	隐私阈值	满足阈值的提供者数目
10	0.4	6
30	0.6	17
50	0.6	30

指标	权重
R	0.35
SD	0.22
WT	0.21
TR	0.22

提供者序列	稳定度
1	0.52
2	0.16
3	0.61
4	0.21
5	0.71
6	0.88

方法	指标数	评估方法	权重确定
文献[7]	3	综合评分	—
文献[22]	5	加权求和	主观分配
PSUS	4	加权求和	改进的熵权处理

D2D data sharing partner selection mechanism based on privacy degree and stability degree

RichHTML

PDF下载

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 22

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Recommended 0

[1]	Xianyi CHEN, Jun GU, Kai YAN, Dong JIANG, Linfeng XU, Zhangjie FU. Double adversarial attack against license plate recognition system [J]. Chinese Journal of Network and Information Security, 2023, 9(3): 16-27.
[2]	Tianpeng YE, Xiang LIN, Jianhua LI, Xuankai ZHANG, Liwen XU. Personalized lightweight distributed network intrusion detection system in fog computing [J]. Chinese Journal of Network and Information Security, 2023, 9(3): 28-37.
[3]	Lijun ZU, Yalin CAO, Xiaohua MEN, Zhihui LYU, Jiawei YE, Hongyi LI, Liang ZHANG. Adaptive selection method of desensitization algorithm based on privacy risk assessment [J]. Chinese Journal of Network and Information Security, 2023, 9(3): 49-59.
[4]	Ruiqi XIA, Manman LI, Shaozhen CHEN. Identification on the structures of block ciphers using machine learning [J]. Chinese Journal of Network and Information Security, 2023, 9(3): 79-89.
[5]	Jingyi YUAN, Zichuan LI, Guojun PENG. EN-Bypass: a security assessment method on e-mail user interface notification [J]. Chinese Journal of Network and Information Security, 2023, 9(3): 90-101.
[6]	Feng YU, Qingxin LIN, Hui LIN, Xiaoding WANG. Privacy-enhanced federated learning scheme based on generative adversarial networks [J]. Chinese Journal of Network and Information Security, 2023, 9(3): 113-122.
[7]	Chuntao ZHU, Chengxi YIN, Bolin ZHANG, Qilin YIN, Wei LU. Forgery face detection method based on multi-domain temporal features mining [J]. Chinese Journal of Network and Information Security, 2023, 9(3): 123-134.
[8]	Xiaomeng LI, Daidou GUO, Xunfang ZHUO, Heng YAO, Chuan QIN. Carrier-independent screen-shooting resistant watermarking based on information overlay superimposition [J]. Chinese Journal of Network and Information Security, 2023, 9(3): 135-149.
[9]	Zhao CAI, Tao JING, Shuang REN. Survey on Ethereum phishing detection technology [J]. Chinese Journal of Network and Information Security, 2023, 9(2): 21-32.
[10]	Yan PAN, Wei LIN, Yuefei ZHU. Progressive active inference method of protocol state machine [J]. Chinese Journal of Network and Information Security, 2023, 9(2): 81-93.
[11]	Pan YANG, Fei KANG, Hui SHU, Yuyao HUANG, Xiaoshao LYU. Binary program taint analysis optimization method based on function summary [J]. Chinese Journal of Network and Information Security, 2023, 9(2): 115-131.
[12]	Tian XIAO, Zhihao JIANG, Peng TANG, Zheng HUANG, Jie GUO, Weidong QIU. High-performance directional fuzzing scheme based on deep reinforcement learning [J]. Chinese Journal of Network and Information Security, 2023, 9(2): 132-142.
[13]	Chenghao YUAN, Yong LI, Shuang REN. Dynamic multi-keyword searchable encryption scheme [J]. Chinese Journal of Network and Information Security, 2023, 9(2): 143-153.
[14]	Zezhou HOU, Jiongjiong REN, Shaozhen CHEN. Security evaluation for parameters of SIMON-like cipher based on neural network distinguisher [J]. Chinese Journal of Network and Information Security, 2023, 9(2): 154-163.
[15]	Xuejing GUO, Yixiang FANG, Yi ZHAO, Tianzhu ZHANG, Wenchao ZENG, Junxiang WANG. Traditional guidance mechanism based deep robust watermarking [J]. Chinese Journal of Network and Information Security, 2023, 9(2): 175-183.