云边协同中的资源调度优化

doi:10.11959/j.issn.1000-0801.2023027

电信科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 163-170.doi: 10.11959/j.issn.1000-0801.2023027

云边协同中的资源调度优化

王淑玲, 孙杰, 王鹏, 杨爱东

亚信科技（中国）有限公司，北京 100193

修回日期:2023-02-08 出版日期:2023-02-20 发布日期:2023-02-01
作者简介:王淑玲（1988- ），女，博士，亚信科技（中国）有限公司研发中心规划部规划总监，主要研究方向为网络通信、云网融合
孙杰（1983- ），男，亚信科技（中国）有限公司研发中心云网规划部经理，主要研究方向为通信与5G网络智能化
王鹏（1976- ），男，亚信科技（中国）有限公司研发中心高级总监，主要研究方向为通信业务支撑、大数据和人工智能
杨爱东（1984- ），男，博士，亚信科技（中国）有限公司通信人工智能实验室首席数据科学家，主要研究方向为 5G 无线通信、大数据挖掘、机器学习及其应用

Resource scheduling optimization in cloud-edge collaboration

Shuling WANG, Jie SUN, Peng WANG, Aidong YANG

Asia Info Technologies (China) Co., Ltd., Beijing 100193, China

Revised:2023-02-08 Online:2023-02-20 Published:2023-02-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

随着业务类型的丰富和多样化，低时延、高带宽、数据私密性、高可靠性等成为业务普遍的要求。边缘计算、雾计算、分布式云、算力网络等方案相继被提出，并在产学研各界引发了深度的研究和探索。针对“多级的算力分布以及算力的协同将是未来算力结构的主流”这一观点，产业内外达成了共识，算力管理、分配、调度等与资源优化相关的问题也成为当下的研究热点和重点攻关方向。为此，面向未来的算力供给结构，首先描述了学术界、产业界资源调度优化问题的最新进展，总结了当前的主要方法论和工程实施架构；然后，针对两种典型的云边协同场景，从场景拆分、调度目标、求解方案依次进行分析，给出了适应场景特性的资源调度优化参考方案。

关键词: 云边协同, 边缘计算, 算网融合, 资源调度优化, 算网联合优化

Abstract:

With the enrichment and diversification of business types, low latency, high bandwidth, data privacy and high reliability have become common requirements.Edge computing, fog computing, distributed cloud, computing power network and other solutions have been proposed, and have triggered in-depth research and exploration in industry, academia and research.There is a consensus within and outside the industry on the view that “multi-level computing power distribution and collaboration of computing power will be the mainstream of computing power structure in the future”.The problems related to resource scheduling optimization, such as computing power management, allocation, scheduling, have also become the current research hotspot and key research direction.Therefore, for the future computing power supply structure, focuses on the latest progress of resource scheduling optimization in academia and industry, the current main methodology and engineering implementation architecture was summarized.And then, for the two typical cloud edge collaboration scenarios, the analysis was carried out from the perspective of scene splitting, scheduling objectives, and solutions in turn, and the resource scheduling optimization reference schemes that adapted to the characteristics of the scenarios were analyzed and discussed respectively.

Key words: cloud-edge collaboration, edge computing, computer and network convergence, resource scheduling optimization, computing and networking joint optimization

中图分类号:

TP393

王淑玲, 孙杰, 王鹏, 杨爱东. 云边协同中的资源调度优化[J]. 电信科学, 2023, 39(2): 163-170.

Shuling WANG, Jie SUN, Peng WANG, Aidong YANG. Resource scheduling optimization in cloud-edge collaboration[J]. Telecommunications Science, 2023, 39(2): 163-170.

图/表 1

参考文献 20

[1]	ETSI. Multi-access edge computing (MEC)[EB]. 2022.
[2]	HU P F , DHELIM S , NING H S ,et al. Survey on fog computing:architecture,key technologies,applications and open issues[J]. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2017(98): 27-42.
[3]	MARTIN A . Distributed computing:utilities,grids ＆ clouds ITU-T technology watch report 2009[R]. 2009.
[4]	ITU-T.Y. 2501:computing power network-framework and architecture[S]. 2019.
[5]	王凌, 吴楚格, 范文慧 . 边缘计算资源分配与任务调度优化综述[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021,33(3): 509-520.
	WANG L , WU C G , FAN W H . A survey of edge computing resource allocation and task scheduling optimization[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2021,33(3): 509-520.
[6]	JAMIL B , IJAZ H , SHOJAFAR M ,et al. Resource allocation and task scheduling in fog computing and Internet of everything environments:a taxonomy,review,and future directions[J]. ACM Computing Surveys, 2022,54(11s): 1-38.
[7]	IBRAHIM E , EL-BAHNASAWY N A , OMARA F A . Task scheduling algorithm in cloud computing environment based on cloud pricing models[C]// Proceedings of 2016 World Symposium on Computer Applications ＆ Research (WSCAR). Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2016: 65-71.
[8]	ABDULLAHI C , GOUR K , JOARDER K . The co-evolution of cloud and IoT applications:recent and future trends[R]. 2019.
[9]	BENBLIDIA M A , BRIK B , MERGHEM-BOULAHIA L ,et al. Ranking fog nodes for tasks scheduling in fog-cloud environments:a fuzzy logic approach[C]// Proceedings of 2019 15th International Wireless Communications ＆ Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC). Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2019: 1451-1457.
[10]	ABDELMONEEM R M , BENSLIMANE A , SHAABAN E . Mobility-aware task scheduling in cloud-Fog IoT-based healthcare architectures[J]. Computer Networks, 2020(179): 107348.
[11]	NI L N , ZHANG J Q , JIANG C J ,et al. Resource allocation strategy in fog computing based on priced timed petri nets[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2017,4(5): 1216-1228.
[12]	ZHAO X Y , ZONG Q , TIAN B L ,et al. Fast task allocation for heterogeneous unmanned aerial vehicles through reinforcement learning[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019(92): 588-594.
[13]	Gartner. Gartner trends 2021:what they mean for retailers[R]. 2020.
[14]	Cloud Networking. The 2020 gartner magic quadrant for data center and cloud networking[R]. 2019.
[15]	中国电信. 云网融合2030技术白皮书[R]. 2020.
	China Telecom. Computing and network convergence technical white paper[R]. 2020.
[16]	RAUSCH T , RASHED A , DUSTDAR S . Optimized container scheduling for data-intensive server less edge computing[J]. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2021 (114): 259-271.
[17]	XU J L , PALANISAMY B , LUDWIG H ,et al. Zenith:utility-aware resource allocation for edge computing[C]// Proceedings of 2017 IEEE International Conference on Edge Computing (EDGE). Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2017: 47-54.
[18]	CHEN J S , BALASUBRAMANIAN B , HUANG Z . Liv(e)-ing on the edge:user-uploaded live streams driven by “first-Mile”edge decisions[C]// Proceedings of 2019 IEEE International Conference on Edge Computing (EDGE). Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2019: 41-50.
[19]	FARHADI V , MEHMETI F , HE T ,et al. Service placement and request scheduling for data-intensive applications in edge clouds[J]. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2021,29(2): 779-792.
[20]	ADDYA S K , SATPATHY A , GHOSH B C ,et al. CoMCLOUD:virtual machine coalition for multi-tier applications over multi-cloud environments[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 2021(99): 1.

云边协同中的资源调度优化

Resource scheduling optimization in cloud-edge collaboration

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 1

参考文献 20

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王帅, 陈丹, 肖羽. 5G行业专网对外服务能力研究[J]. 电信科学, 2022, 38(Z1): 143-148.
[2]	王文哲, 安岗, 吴健, 赵文东, 王延刚, 赵云峰, 狄子翔, 顾照杰, 邹贵祥. 一种支持云原生的工业互联网业务管理平台[J]. 电信科学, 2022, 38(Z1): 203-213.
[3]	顾博, 敖婷. 基于MEC的定位技术在车联网中的应用[J]. 电信科学, 2022, 38(Z1): 250-258.
[4]	伏玉笋, 唐金辉. 使能未来工厂的5G能力综述[J]. 电信科学, 2022, 38(9): 18-35.
[5]	张天魁, 徐瑜, 刘元玮, 杨鼎成, 任元红. 无人机辅助MEC系统：架构、关键技术与未来挑战[J]. 电信科学, 2022, 38(8): 3-16.
[6]	邢文娟, 雷波, 赵倩颖. 算力基础设施发展现状与趋势展望[J]. 电信科学, 2022, 38(6): 51-61.
[7]	邓平科, 张同须, 施南翔, 张童, 邵天竺, 郑韶雯. 星算网络——空天地一体化算力融合网络新发展[J]. 电信科学, 2022, 38(6): 71-81.
[8]	冯晓丽, 刘晨, 张丽伟, 王晓韵. 基于5G MEC的智慧化园区解决方案[J]. 电信科学, 2022, 38(5): 54-63.
[9]	邹璐珊, 黄晓雯, 杨敬民, 郑艺峰, 张光林, 张文杰. 移动边缘计算中资源分配和定价方法综述[J]. 电信科学, 2022, 38(3): 113-132.
[10]	绳韵, 许晨, 郑光远. 基于NOMA的超密集MEC网络任务卸载和资源分配方案[J]. 电信科学, 2022, 38(2): 35-46.
[11]	杨震, 赵建军, 黄勇军, 李洁, 陈楠. 基于网络演进的人工智能技术方向研究[J]. 电信科学, 2022, 38(12): 27-34.
[12]	刘云毅, 张建敏, 冯晓丽, 张丽伟. 5G MEC系统安全能力部署方案[J]. 电信科学, 2022, 38(11): 143-152.
[13]	李琴, 李唯源, 孙晓文, 胡玉双, 孙滔. 6G网络智能内生的思考[J]. 电信科学, 2021, 37(9): 20-29.
[14]	陈瑞凤, 李君, 徐春婕, 程清波, 吕晓军. 5G在铁路智能车站中的应用[J]. 电信科学, 2021, 37(7): 86-95.
[15]	孙茜, 田霖, 周一青, 冯晨, 王园园, 周继华. 面向B5G和6G的边缘计算与网络切片资源管理[J]. 电信科学, 2021, 37(6): 55-65.