未来网络技术与发展趋势综述

doi:10.11959/j.issn.1000-436x.2021006

通信学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 130-150.doi: 10.11959/j.issn.1000-436x.2021006

未来网络技术与发展趋势综述

黄韬¹^,², 刘江¹^,², 汪硕¹^,², 张晨², 刘韵洁¹^,²

¹ 北京邮电大学网络与交换国家重点实验室，北京 100876
² 网络通信与安全紫金山实验室，江苏南京 211111

修回日期:2020-08-18 出版日期:2021-01-25 发布日期:2021-01-01
作者简介:黄韬（1980- ），男，重庆人，博士，北京邮电大学教授，主要研究方向为路由与交换、软件定义网络、网络试验设施等。
刘江（1983- ），男，河南郑州人，博士，北京邮电大学副教授，主要研究方向为网络体系架构、网络虚拟化、软件定义网络、信息中心网络等。
汪硕（1991- ），男，河南灵宝人，博士，北京邮电大学讲师，主要研究方向为数据中心网络、软件定义网络、网络流量调度等。
张晨（1992- ），男，辽宁锦州人，网络通信与安全紫金山实验室研究员，主要研究方向为计算机网络、软件定义网络等。
刘韵洁（1943- ），男，山东烟台人，中国工程院院士，主要研究方向为未来网络体系架构、网络融合与演进等。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划基金资助项目(2018YFB1800500);国家自然科学基金资助项目(61902033);北京市自然科学基金资助项目(4204105);广东省重点领域研发计划基金资助项目(2018B010113001)

Survey of the future network technology and trend

Tao HUANG¹^,², Jiang LIU¹^,², Shuo WANG¹^,², Chen ZHANG², Yunjie LIU¹^,²

¹ State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
² Purple Mountain Laboratories, Nanjing 211111, China

Revised:2020-08-18 Online:2021-01-25 Published:2021-01-01
Supported by:
The National Key Research and Development Program of China(2018YFB1800500);The National Natural Science Foundation of China(61902033);Beijing Natural Science Foundation(4204105);The Research and Development Program in Key Areas of Guangdong Province(2018B010113001)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

对面向 2030 的未来网络领域的发展趋势进行了综述。首先，介绍了网络体系架构和试验设施领域的研究进展；其次，从网络控制与编排、网络深度可编程、网络确定性服务、网络计算存储一体化、网络与人工智能、网络与区块链、智能安全网络、网络空天地海一体化8个方面阐述了当前热点网络技术的背景、进展和主要成果；最后，分析了面向2030的未来网络发展趋势，预计到2030年未来网络将支撑万亿级、人机物、全时空、安全、智能的连接与服务。希望能为未来网络相关领域的研究提供参考和帮助。

关键词: 未来网络体系结构, 网络操作系统, 可编程数据平面, 确定性网络, 网络计算存储一体化, 网络人工智能, 网络安全

Abstract:

Several typical technologies about the future network were introduced.First, the background of each technology were introduced.Then, the current research progress and main results of each technology were expounded from eight aspects: network control and orchestration, programmable network, deterministic network, network computing and storage integration, network with artificial intelligence, network with blockchain, intelligent security network, space network.Finally the development trends and challenges of each technology were analyzed.It was expected that by 2030, the future network will support trillion-level, human-machine, all-time-space, safe, and intelligent connections and services.It is hoped that it can provide references and help for future network research.

Key words: future network architecture, network operating system, programmable data plane, deterministic network, network computing and storage integration, network artificial intelligence, network security

中图分类号:

TP393

黄韬, 刘江, 汪硕, 张晨, 刘韵洁. 未来网络技术与发展趋势综述[J]. 通信学报, 2021, 42(1): 130-150.

Tao HUANG, Jiang LIU, Shuo WANG, Chen ZHANG, Yunjie LIU. Survey of the future network technology and trend[J]. Journal on Communications, 2021, 42(1): 130-150.

图/表 6

表1

图1

表2

图2

图3

表3

参考文献 61

[1]	CROWCROFT J , HAND S , MORTIER R ,et al. Plutarch:an argument for network pluralism[J]. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2003,33(4): 258-266.
[2]	NAYLOR D , MUKERJEE M K , AGYAPONG P ,et al. XIA:architecting a more trustworthy and evolvable Internet[J]. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2014,44(3): 50-57.
[3]	ZAVE P , REXFORD J . The compositional architecture of the Internet[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2019,62(3): 78-87.
[4]	MCCAULEY J , HARCHOL Y , PANDA A ,et al. Enabling a permanent revolution in Internet architecture[C]// Proceedings of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication. New York:ACM Press, 2019: 1-14.
[5]	YANG M , LI Y , JIN D ,et al. Software-defined and virtualized future mobile and wireless networks:a survey[J]. Mobile Networks and Applications, 2015,20(1): 4-18.
[6]	吴建平, 李丹, 毕军 ,等. ADN:地址驱动的网络体系结构[J]. 计算机学报, 2015,38(6): 1-12.
	WU J P , LI D , BI J ,et al. ADN:address driven Internet architecture[J]. Chinese Journal of Computers, 2015,38(6): 1-12.
[7]	张宏科, 黄道超 . 智慧标识网络的未来互联网体系[J]. 电信科学, 2013(S1): 20-28.
	ZHANG H K , HUANG D C . Architecture of future Internet based on smart identifier-based network[J]. Telecommunications Science, 2013(S1): 20-28.
[8]	胡宇翔, 伊鹏, 孙鹏浩 ,等. 全维可定义的多模态智慧网络体系研究[J]. 通信学报, 2019,40(8): 1-12.
	HU Y X , YI P , SUN P H ,et al. Research on the full-dimensional defined polymorphic smart network[J]. Journal on Communications, 2019,40(8): 1-12.
[9]	杨鹏, 李幼平 . 支持内容智能治理的双结构互联网[J]. 通信学报, 2019,40(9): 1-14.
	YANG P , LI Y P . Dual-architecture Internet supporting intelligent governance of cyber content[J]. Journal on Communications, 2019,40(9): 1-14.
[10]	刘韵洁, 张娇, 黄韬 ,等. 面向服务定制的未来网络架构[J]. 重庆邮电大学学报:自然科学版, 2018,30(1): 1-8.
	LIU Y J , ZHANG J , HUANG T ,et al. Service customized future network architecture[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Natural Science Edition), 2018,30(1): 1-8.
[11]	BERMAN M , CHASE J S , LANDWEBER L ,et al. GENI:a federated testbed for innovative network experiments[J]. Computer Networks, 2014,61: 5-23.
[12]	MCGEER R , BERMAN M , ELLIOTT C . The GENI book[M]. Berlin: Springer, 2016.
[13]	HUANG T , YU F R , ZHANG C ,et al. A survey on large-scale software defined networking (SDN) testbeds:approaches and challenges[J]. IEEE Communications Surveys ＆ Tutorials, 2016,19(2): 891-917.
[14]	RICCI R , EIDE E , TEAM C L . Introducing CloudLab:scientific infrastructure for advancing cloud architectures and applications[J]. the magazine of USENIX ＆ SAGE, 2014,39(6): 36-38.
[15]	DUPLYAKIN D , RICCI R , MARICQ A ,et al. The design and operation of CloudLab[C]// 2019 USENIX Annual Technical Conference. Berkeley:USENIX Association, 2019: 1-14.
[16]	KEAHEY K , MAMBRETTI J , RUTH P ,et al. Chameleon:a large-scale,deeply reconfigurable testbed for computer science research[C]// 2019 IEEE 27th International Conference on Network Protocols. Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2019: 1-2.
[17]	BARON L , KLACZA R , RAHMAN M Y ,et al. OneLab:on-demand deployment of IoT over IPv6[C]// International Conference on Computer Communications. Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2016: 1-3.
[18]	KANAUMI Y , SAITO S , KAWAI E ,et al. RISE:a wide-area hybrid OpenFlow network testbed[J]. IEICE Transactions on Communications, 2013,96(1): 108-118.
[19]	KANAUMI Y , SAITO S , KAWAI E ,et al. Deployment and operation of wide-area hybrid OpenFlow networks[C]// 2012 IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium. Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2012: 1135-1142.
[20]	MIYACHI T , CHINEN K , SHINODA Y . StarBED and SpringOS:large-scale general purpose network testbed and supporting software[C]// Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodolgies and Tools. New York:ACM Press, 2006:30.
[21]	TERANISHI Y , SAITO Y , MURONO S ,et al. JOSE:an open testbed for field trials of large-scale IoT services[J]. Journal of the National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, 2015,62(2): 151-159.
[22]	LINGUAGLOSSA L , LANGE S , PONTARELLI S ,et al. Survey of performance acceleration techniques for network function virtualization[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2019,107(4): 746-764.
[23]	ZHAO Y , LI Y , ZHANG X ,et al. A survey of networking applications applying the software defined networking concept based on machine learning[J]. IEEE Access, 2019,7: 95397-95417.
[24]	MUHAMMAD S , SEAN C , BEN P ,et al. PISCES:a programmable,protocol-independent software switch[C]// Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGCOMM Conference. New York:ACM Press, 2016: 525-538.
[25]	WANG H , LEE K.S , SHRIVASTAV V ,et al. P4FPGA:high level synthesis for networking[C]// Proceedings of the 2017 Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communicaiton. New York:ACM Press, 2017: 122-135.
[26]	WANG H , ROBERT S , DANG H T ,et al. P4FPGA:a rapid prototyping framework for P4[C]// Symposium on SDN Research. New York:ACM Press, 2017: 122-135.
[27]	JACOBSON V , SMETTERS D K , THORNTON J D ,et al. Networking named content[C]// Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies. New York:ACM Press, 2009: 1-12.
[28]	ZHANG M , LUO H , ZHANG H . A survey of caching mechanisms in information-centric networking[J]. IEEE Communications Surveys ＆Tutorials, 2015,17(3): 1473-1499.
[29]	ZHANG L , AFANASYEV A , BURKE J ,et al. Named data networking[J]. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2014,44(3): 66-73.
[30]	HU Y C , PATEL M , SABELLA D ,et al. Mobile edge computing—a key technology towards 5G[J]. ETSI White Paper, 2015,11(11): 1-16.
[31]	HUO R , YU F R , HUANG T ,et al. Software defined networking,caching,and computing for green wireless networks[J]. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2016,54(11): 185-193.
[32]	BECK M , MOORE T , LUSZCZEK P ,et al. Interoperable Convergence of Storage,Networking,and Computation[C]// Future of Information and Communication Conference. Berlin:Springer, 2019: 667-690.
[33]	ZHOU Y , TIAN L , LIU L ,et al. Fog computing enabled future mobile communication networks:a convergence of communication and computing[J]. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2019,57(5): 20-27.
[34]	WANG S , ZHANG X , ZHANG Y ,et al. A survey on mobile edge networks:convergence of computing,caching and communications[J]. IEEE Access, 2017,5: 6757-6779.
[35]	BOUTABA R , SALAHUDDIN M A , LIMAM N ,et al. A comprehensive survey on machine learning for networking:evolution,applications and research opportunities[J]. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 2018,9(1): 16.
[36]	WANG S , TUOR T , SALONIDIS T ,et al. Adaptive federated learning in resource constrained edge computing systems[J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2019,37(6): 1205-1221.
[37]	USMAN M , JAN M A , HE X ,et al. P2DCA:a privacy-preserving-based data collection and analysis framework for IoMT applications[J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2019,37(6): 1222-1230.
[38]	MARCHAL S , MIETTINEN M , NGUYEN T D ,et al. AuDI:toward autonomous IoT device-type identification using periodic communication[J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2019,37(6): 1402-1412.
[39]	XIAO F , CHEN L , ZHU H ,et al. Anomaly-tolerant network traffic estimation via noise-immune temporal matrix completion model[J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2019,37(6): 1192-1204.
[40]	ZHANG C , ZHANG H , QIAO J ,et al. Deep transfer learning for intelligent cellular traffic prediction based on cross-domain big data[J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2019,37(6): 1389-1401.
[41]	FANG L , CHENG X , WANG H ,et al. Idle time window prediction in cellular networks with deep spatiotemporal modeling[J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2019,37(6): 1441-1454.
[42]	XIE J , YU F R , HUANG T ,et al. A survey of machine learning techniques applied to software defined networking (SDN):research issues and challenges[J]. IEEE Communications Surveys ＆ Tutorials, 2018,21(1): 393-430.
[43]	FADLULLAH Z M , TANG F , MAO B ,et al. State-of-the-art deep learning:Evolving machine intelligence toward tomorrow’s intelligent network traffic control systems[J]. IEEE Communications Surveys ＆Tutorials, 2017,19(4): 2432-2455.
[44]	AKHTAR Z , NAM Y S , GOVINDAN R ,et al. Oboe:auto-tuning video ABR algorithms to network conditions[C]// Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication. New York:ACM Press, 2018: 44-58.
[45]	VAN H N , HOANG D T , NGUYEN D N ,et al. Optimal and fast real-time resource slicing with deep dueling neural networks[J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2019,37(6): 1455-1470.
[46]	MAO H , SCHWARZKOPF M , VENKATAKRISHNAN S B ,et al. Learning scheduling algorithms for data processing clusters[C]// Proceedings of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication. New York:ACM Press, 2019: 270-288.
[47]	DONG M , MENG T , ZARCHY D ,et al. PCC vivace:online-learning congestion control[C]// USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation. Berkeley:USENIX Association, 2018: 343-356.
[48]	VALADARSKY A , SCHAPIRA M , SHAHAF D ,et al. Learning to route[C]// Proceedings of the 16th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks. New York:ACM Press, 2017: 185-191.
[49]	RAVIDAS S , LEKIDIS A , PACI F ,et al. Access control in Internet-of-things:a survey[J]. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2019,144: 79-101.
[50]	SIBAI R E , GEMAYEL N , ABDO J B ,et al. A survey on access control mechanisms for cloud computing[J]. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 2020:doi.org/10.1002/ett.3720.
[51]	KOCABAS O , SOYATA T . Towards privacy-preserving medical cloud computing using homomorphic encryption[M]. Hershey: IGI Global, 2020.
[52]	LIU H , LANG B . Machine learning and deep learning methods for intrusion detection systems:a survey[J]. Applied Sciences, 2019,9(20): 4396.
[53]	SHONE N , NGOC T N , PHAI V D ,et al. A deep learning approach to network intrusion detection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, 2018,2(1): 41-50.
[54]	WU D , XIA Y , SUN X S ,et al. Masking failures from application performance in data center networks with shareable backup[C]// Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication. New York:ACM Press, 2018: 176-190.
[55]	LUCKIE M , BEVERLY R . The impact of router outages on the AS-level Internet[C]// Proceedings of the Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication. New York:ACM Press, 2017: 488-501.
[56]	TOOTAGHAJ D Z , BARTOLINI N , KHAMFROUSH H ,et al. On progressive network recovery from massive failures under uncertainty[J]. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 2018,16(1): 113-126.
[57]	LI D , SHEN X , CHEN N ,et al. Space-based information service in Internet Plus Era[J]. Science China Information Sciences, 2017,60(10): 102308.
[58]	LIU J , SHI Y , FADLULLAH Z M ,et al. Space-air-ground integrated network:a survey[J]. IEEE Communications Surveys ＆ Tutorials, 2018,20(4): 2714-2741.
[59]	CASONI M , GRAZIA C A , KLAPEZ M ,et al. Integration of satellite and LTE for disaster recovery[J]. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2015,53(3): 47-53.
[60]	MENDOZA F , FERRúS R , SALLENT O . A traffic distribution scheme for 5G resilient backhauling using integrated satellite networks[C]// 2017 13th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference. Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2017: 1671-1676.
[61]	ZHAO C , SHI M , HUANG M M ,et al. Authentication Scheme based on hashchain for space-air-ground integrated network[C]// ICC 2019-2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2019: 1-6.

试验平台	平台主旨	支持功能
GENI^[11]	创建分布式试验平台支持计算机科学试验并促进试验设计、执行和记录的良好规范	OpenFlow技术，按需申请网络资源
CloudLab^[14]	提供支持各种云计算研究的大规模、多样化、分布式试验平台	提供云计算资源，构建上层云应用，裸机控制和可视性
Chameleon^[16]	大型、可深度重配置的计算机科学试验平台	软件堆栈的完全控制，系统裸机重配置
OneLab	将试验平台扩展至整个欧洲并与全球其他 PlanetLab 基础设施联合，构建开放、可持续的大规模共享试验设施	单一入口访问异构资源和分布式资源，联合多个权限控制下资源的联合模型
Fed4FIRE+	构建全球最大的下一代互联网联合试验平台	对云计算、大数据分析、媒体分发网络、智能城市、5G和物联网领域相关研究的支持
RISE^[18]	提供大规模、真实的SDN验证环境	为大规模网络及物联网相关技术试验提供支持
CENI	提供一个大规模虚拟化网络环境，为新型网络服务部署、新设备的大规模测试、新型网络业务提供测试平台和应用基础环境	满足关于下一代互联网、网络空间安全、天地一体化网络等的试验验证需求

技术领域	面临问题	创新技术	技术展望
网络控制与编排	传统分布式网络操作复杂、管控困难	控制器架构、控制平面性能、控制平面接口、业务编排和虚拟网元编排	开放灵活、面向业务，实现异构云网边端资源的控制、编排、调度的网络操作系统
网络深度可编程	传统设备标准不兼容、硬件功能固定	编程语言、可编程芯片、智能网络接口卡	形成一个可验证的闭环控制管理网络
网络确定性服务	传统以太网机理上欠缺服务质量保障能力	FlexE、TSN、DetNet	实端到端的控制、资源管理以及安全性策略的网络
网络计算存储一体化	传统模式不具备高速缓存和计算能力	内容分发网络、信息中心网络、云计算、雾计算、边缘计算	构建可扩展部署的网络、存储和计算互操作融合的分布式系统
网络与人工智能	网络复杂性增加	监控、建模、整体控制、数据收集、流量预测、网络切片、拥塞控制	网络自我驱动为主的自治模式网络
网络与区块链	当前中心化应用权力过大	解决身份认证、标识解析、路由等层面的安全可信问题	形成多中心化、甚至于去中心化的云网基础设施
智能安全网络	传统网络和安全孤立，缺乏一体化设计	信息保护、入侵检测和故障恢复	端到端安全传输、认证及管理、入侵检测、网络故障精准定位和快速恢复的系统
网络空天地海一体化	网络容量和覆盖范围的限制	组网架构设计、空间网络协议族、移动性切换机制、资源协同管理	提供高效、经济、实时服务的网络空天地海一体化网络体系

发展方向	现有成果	首要问题
新型网络体系架构	研发Flexible IP、确定性转发、去中心化互联网基础设施、内生安全等新技术；建设网络试验环境	合理的预判未来应用的发展、评估网络重大需要、设计未来新型网络架构
确定性网络控制与服务	研发可编程网络芯片、制定确定性技术国际标准、开展确定性网络技术的大规模测试	设计局域网时延敏感芯片、设计主干网确定性网络架构
去中心化网络应用	信通院等单位进行新型标识解析体系的研究与技术攻关	设计去中心化的新型标识解析体系、BGP 和网络
		存储
空天地海一体化泛在互联	进行空天互联网的系统设计与研制；进行浮空飞艇的研究，以实现低成本区域性网络覆盖	满足未来的泛在互联接入需求，利用卫星、飞艇、6G等多种方式实现网络的低成本全球覆盖
智能化网络与通信	早期或试点阶段，但迄今为止几乎没有大规模的部署	人工智能与网络相结合，实现网络智能化

未来网络技术与发展趋势综述

Survey of the future network technology and trend

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 61

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0

[1]	郭渊博, 李勇飞, 陈庆礼, 方晨, 胡阳阳. 融合Focal Loss的网络威胁情报实体抽取[J]. 通信学报, 2022, 43(7): 85-92.
[2]	杨思锦, 庄雷, 宋玉, 王家兴, 阳鑫宇. 多模态网络中时间敏感网络模态的智能调度机制[J]. 通信学报, 2022, 43(5): 82-91.
[3]	王鹏, 张修社, 索龙, 史可懿. 基于随机时变图的时间确定性网络路由算法[J]. 通信学报, 2021, 42(9): 21-30.
[4]	张红斌, 尹彦, 赵冬梅, 刘滨. 基于威胁情报的网络安全态势感知模型[J]. 通信学报, 2021, 42(6): 182-194.
[5]	潘恬, 林兴晨, 张娇, 黄韬, 刘韵洁. 基于高性能包处理架构VPP的带内网络遥测系统[J]. 通信学报, 2021, 42(3): 75-90.
[6]	张腾飞, 余顺争. 移动设备加密流量的用户信息探测研究展望[J]. 通信学报, 2021, 42(2): 154-167.
[7]	程旭, 王莹莹, 张年杰, 付章杰, 陈北京, 赵国英. 基于空间感知的多级损失目标跟踪对抗攻击方法[J]. 通信学报, 2021, 42(11): 242-254.
[8]	苏建忠, 张华宇, 朱海龙. 结合SDN控制器的TSN周期性带宽预留值计算方法[J]. 通信学报, 2021, 42(10): 23-31.
[9]	李硕朋, 方娟, 陈肯. 基于SRv6的确定性网络服务共享保护方案[J]. 通信学报, 2021, 42(10): 32-42.
[10]	罗智勇,杨旭,刘嘉辉,许瑞. 基于贝叶斯攻击图的网络入侵意图分析模型[J]. 通信学报, 2020, 41(9): 160-169.
[11]	吴武飞,李仁发,曾刚,谢勇,谢国琪. 智能网联车网络安全研究综述[J]. 通信学报, 2020, 41(6): 161-174.
[12]	李涛,郭渊博,琚安康. 融合对抗主动学习的网络安全知识三元组抽取[J]. 通信学报, 2020, 41(10): 80-91.
[13]	周翰逊,陈晨,冯润泽,熊俊坤,潘宏,郭薇. 基于值导数GRU的移动恶意软件流量检测方法[J]. 通信学报, 2020, 41(1): 102-113.
[14]	蒋侣,张恒巍,王晋东. 基于信号博弈的移动目标防御最优策略选取方法[J]. 通信学报, 2019, 40(6): 128-137.
[15]	黄韬,汪硕,黄玉栋,郑尧,刘江,刘韵洁. 确定性网络研究综述[J]. 通信学报, 2019, 40(6): 160-176.