“科学学”视角下的科研工作者行为研究

doi:10.11959/j.issn.2096-0271.2019040

大数据 ›› 2019, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (5): 38-47.doi: 10.11959/j.issn.2096-0271.2019040

“科学学”视角下的科研工作者行为研究

贾韬¹,夏锋²

¹ 西南大学计算机与信息科学学院，重庆 400715
² 大连理工大学软件学院，辽宁大连 116620

出版日期:2019-09-15 发布日期:2019-10-11
作者简介:贾韬（1982-），男，博士，西南大学计算机与信息科学学院教授、副院长，主要研究方向为大数据、复杂网络等，以第一作者（兼共同通信作者）在Nature Human Behaviour、Nature Communications、Physical Review Letters等学术期刊发表多篇论文。获2010年年度国家优秀自费留学生奖学金。|夏锋（1980-），男，博士，大连理工大学教授、博士生导师，软件学院副院长、学术委员会副主任，阿尔法实验室（The Alpha Lab）创始人兼主任，ACM高级会员、IEEE高级会员，主要研究方向为数据科学、大数据、知识管理、系统工程等。出版英文学术专著2部（Springer出版），在国际期刊和国际会议上发表论文290余篇，其中IEEE和ACM期刊论文70余篇。连续5年（2014—2018年）入选“中国高被引学者”榜单。
基金资助:
：国家自然科学基金资助项目(61603309)

Quantifying patterns in the behavior of scientists in Science of Science study

Tao JIA¹,Feng XIA²

¹ College of Computer and Information Science,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715,China
² School of Software,Dalian University of Technology,Dalian 116620,China

Online:2019-09-15 Published:2019-10-11
Supported by:
The National Natural Science Foundation of China(61603309)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

科学的复杂性、数据的可用性、对科学研究中客观规律认知的现实需求使得“科学学”这一传统问题转变为新兴的交叉研究热点。科学研究的主导者是科研工作者，研究科学中的规律首先要了解科研工作者的行为特征。梳理、介绍了几个相关的工作，包括科研工作者研究兴趣的演化、科研合作的内在驱动因素、科研团队与科研team的异同、多维度科研评价与学术不端的监测。研究结果可以为科研管理等现实问题提供理论工具和实证支撑。

关键词: 科学学, 科研合作, 科研评价, 学术画像

Abstract:

The complexity of science,the data availability and the need for better understanding of science promote the research in an emerging field of “Science of Science”.To understand the regularities in science,we need to first understand the behavior patterns of scientists.A few related works were reviewed and introduced,including research interest evolution,internal microscopic driven force in scientific collaboration,the difference of research tuandui and research team,and the multidimensional measure of a scholar’s performance to prevent academic gaming.The results obtained will provide theoretical tools and empirical supports for practical issues related with research policy and research evaluation.

Key words: Science of Science, scientific collaboration, research evaluation, academia profile

中图分类号:

TP39

贾韬, 夏锋. “科学学”视角下的科研工作者行为研究[J]. 大数据, 2019, 5(5): 38-47.

Tao JIA, Feng XIA. Quantifying patterns in the behavior of scientists in Science of Science study[J]. Big Data Research, 2019, 5(5): 38-47.

图/表 3

参考文献 37

[1]	KUHN T S . The structure of scientific revolutions[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago PressPress, 2012.
[2]	DE SOLLA P D J . Little science,big science and beyond[M]. New York: Columbia University PressPress, 1986.
[3]	SINATRA R , WANG D , DEVILLE P ,et al. Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact[J]. Science, 2016,354(6312):5239.
[4]	DA SILVA J A T . Does China need to rethink its metrics-and citationbased research rewards policies[J]. Scientometrics, 2017,112(3): 1853-1857.
[5]	AZOULAY P , GRAFF-ZIVIN J , UZZI B ,et al. Toward a more scientific science[J]. Science, 2018,361(6408): 1194-1197.
[6]	JONES B F , WUCHTY S , UZZI B . Multiuniversity research teams:shifting impact,geography,and stratification in science[J]. Science, 2008,322(5905): 1259-1262.
[7]	WUCHTY S , JONES B F , UZZI B . The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge[J]. Science, 2007,316(5827): 1036-1039.
[8]	ZENG A , SHEN Z S , ZHOU J L ,et al. The Science of Science:from the perspective of complex systems[J]. Physics ReportsReview Section of Physics Letters, 2017(714-715): 1-73.
[9]	FORTUNATO S , BERGSTROM C T B?RNER K ,et al. Science of science[J]. Science, 2018,359(6379).
[10]	钱学森 . 希望[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 1981(1):7.
	QIAN X S . Hope[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.＆.T., 1981(1):7.
[11]	WANG D , SONG C , BARABáSI A L . Quantifying long-term scientific impact[J]. Science, 2013,342(6154): 127-132.
[12]	HSIEHCHEN D , ESPINOZA M , HSIEH A . Multinational teams and diseconomies of scale in collaborative research[J]. Science Advances, 2015,1(8):e1500211.
[13]	RZHETSKY A , FOSTER J G , FOSTER I T ,et al. Choosing experiments to accelerate collective discovery[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015,112(47): 14569-14574.
[14]	JIA T , WANG D , SZYMANSKI B K . Quantifying patterns of research-interest evolution[J]. Nature Human Behaviour, 2017,1(4):78.
[15]	WAY S F , MORGAN A C , CLAUSET A ,et al. The misleading narrative of the canonical faculty productivity trajectory[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017,114(44): 9216-9223.
[16]	WU L , WANG D , EVANS J A . Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology[J]. Nature, 2019,566(7744): 378-382.
[17]	XIE Y , ZHANG C , LAI Q . China’s rise as a major contributor to science and technology[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014,111(26): 9437-9442.
[18]	HUANG F . Quality deficit belies the hype[J]. Nature, 2018,564(7735):70.
[19]	KUHN T S . The essential tension[J]. American Journal of Physics, 1979,47(6): 568-569.
[20]	AZOULAY P , GRAFF ZIVIN J S , MANSO G . Incentives and creativity:evidence from the academic life sciences[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 2011,42(3): 527-554.
[21]	TIAN X , WANG T Y . Tolerance for failure and corporate innovation[J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2014,27(1): 211-255.
[22]	FOSTER J G , RZHETSKY A , EVANS J A . Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies[J]. American Sociological Review, 2015,80(5): 875-908.
[23]	TANG J , ZHANG J , YAO L ,et al. Arnetminer:extraction and mining of academic social networks[C]// The 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining,August 24-27,2008,Las Vegas,USA. New York:ACM Press, 2018: 990-998.
[24]	XIA F , WANG W , BEKELE T M ,et al. Big scholarly data:a survey[J]. IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 2017,3(1): 18-35.
[25]	RZHETSKY A , FOSTER J G , FOSTER I T ,et al. Choosing experiments to accelerate collective discovery[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015,112(47): 14569-14574.
[26]	COKOL M , IOSSIFOV I , WEINREB C ,et al. Emergent behavior of growing knowledge about molecular interactions[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2005,23(10): 1243-1247.
[27]	KABO F W , COTTON-NESSLER N , HWANG Y ,et al. Proximity effects on the dynamics and outcomes of scientific collaborations[J]. Research Policy, 2014,43(9): 1469-1485.
[28]	LEAHEY E . From sole investigator to team scientist:trends in the practice and study of research collaboration[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 2016,42(1): 81-100.
[29]	WANG W , YU S , BEKELE T M ,et al. Scientific collaboration patterns vary with scholars’ academic ages[J]. Scientometrics, 2017,112(1): 329-343.
[30]	WANG W , LIU J , YANG Z ,et al. Sustainable collaborator recommendation based on conference closure[J]. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 2019,6(2): 311-322.
[31]	National Research Council . Enhancing the effectiveness of team science[M]. Pittsburgh: National Academies PressPress, 2015.
[32]	方文东 . 关于科研团队组建的一些认识[J]. 科技管理研究, 2002,22(4): 42-43.
	FANG W D . The attitude about organizing scientific research group[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2002,22(4): 42-43.
[33]	WANG J , HICKS D . Scientific teams:selfassembly,fluidness,and interdependence[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2015,9(1): 197-207.
[34]	LEE Y N , WALSH J P , WANG J . Creativity in scientific teams:unpacking novelty and impact[J]. Research Policy, 2015,44(3): 684-697.
[35]	DONG Y , MA H , TANG J ,et al. Collaboration diversity and scientific impact[J]..03694. Computer Science,2018,arXiv:1806.03694.
[36]	YU S , XIA F , ZHANG K ,et al. Team recognition in big scholarly data:exploring collaboration intensity[C]// 2017 IEEE 15th International Conference on Dependable,Autonomic and Secure Computing,September 17-21,2017,St.Petersburg,USA. Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2017: 925-932.
[37]	BIAGIOLI M , KENNEY M , MARTIN B ,et al. Academic misconduct,misrepresentation and gaming:a reassessment[J]. Research Policy, 2018.

“科学学”视角下的科研工作者行为研究

Quantifying patterns in the behavior of scientists in Science of Science study

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 37

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0

[1]	叶雅珍, 朱扬勇. 数字化转型服务平台：面向新竞争格局的企业竞争力建设[J]. 大数据, 2023, 9(3): 3-14.
[2]	刘豆豆, 焦宝臣. 高校数据资产编目研究[J]. 大数据, 2023, 9(3): 71-84.
[3]	王皓, 潘昱杉, 潘毅. 生成式人工智能大模型赋能的元宇宙生命体：前瞻和挑战[J]. 大数据, 2023, 9(3): 85-96.
[4]	吴亚东, 陈家鸣, 罗焱, 王学锋, 黄德春, 倪超, 蓝集明, 李随群, 张巍瀚, 代唯. 彩灯元宇宙研究综述[J]. 大数据, 2023, 9(3): 97-113.
[5]	邓钇敏, 张旭龙, 司世景, 王健宗, 肖京. 虚拟人形象合成技术综述[J]. 大数据, 2023, 9(3): 114-139.
[6]	李婧文, 李雅文. 算法应用风险与治理研究[J]. 大数据, 2023, 9(3): 140-149.
[7]	王元卓, 张琨, 陆源. 漫威电影中的智能穿戴[J]. 大数据, 2023, 9(3): 181-183.
[8]	万小军. 智能文本生成：进展与挑战[J]. 大数据, 2023, 9(2): 99-109.
[9]	王泽宇, 吕艾临, 闫树. 数据要素形成与价值释放规律研究[J]. 大数据, 2023, 9(2): 33-45.
[10]	朱扬勇, 谢波峰. 数据财政：数字经济发展过程中的公共利益实现[J]. 大数据, 2023, 9(2): 163-166.
[11]	王元卓, 李子健, 陆源. 漫威电影中的图灵测试[J]. 大数据, 2023, 9(2): 167-169.
[12]	焦荟聪, 刘文菊, 王赜. 基于指数机制的轨迹差分隐私保护方法[J]. 大数据, 2023, 9(1): 141-152.
[13]	林清音, 陈志广. 基于更新热点感知的LSM-Tree查询优化[J]. 大数据, 2023, 9(1): 126-140.
[14]	梅宏, 杜小勇, 金海, 程学旗, 柴云鹏, 石宣化, 靳小龙, 王亚沙, 刘驰. 大数据技术前瞻[J]. 大数据, 2023, 9(1): 1-20.
[15]	贺亚运, 彭俊清, 王健宗, 肖京. 节奏舞者：基于关键动作转换图和有条件姿态插值网络的3D舞蹈生成方法研究[J]. 大数据, 2023, 9(1): 23-37.