基于SRv6的确定性网络服务共享保护方案

doi:10.11959/j.issn.1000-436x.2021203

通信学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10): 32-42.doi: 10.11959/j.issn.1000-436x.2021203

基于SRv6的确定性网络服务共享保护方案

李硕朋¹, 方娟¹, 陈肯²

¹ 北京工业大学信息学部，北京 100124
² 法国索邦巴黎北大学伽利略理工学院，维尔塔纳斯 93430

修回日期:2021-10-11 出版日期:2021-10-25 发布日期:2021-10-01
作者简介:李硕朋（1989- ），男，满族，辽宁抚顺人，博士，北京工业大学助理研究员，主要研究方向为软件定义网络、深度学习等
方娟（1973- ），女，辽宁鞍山人，博士，北京工业大学教授、博士生导师，主要研究方向为高性能计算、异构智能计算、边缘计算等
陈肯（1960- ），男，上海人，博士，法国索邦巴黎北大学教授、博士生导师，主要研究方向为无线传感器网络、软件定义网络等
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划基金资助项目(2020YFF0305400);北京市自然科学基金资助项目(4192007);北京工业大学国际科研合作种子基金资助项目(2021B02);北京工业大学国际科研合作种子基金资助项目(2021C02)

DetNet service share protection scheme based on SRv6

Shuopeng LI¹, Juan FANG¹, Ken CHEN²

¹ Faculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
² Institute Galilee, University Sorbonne Paris Nord, Villetaneuse 93430, France

Revised:2021-10-11 Online:2021-10-25 Published:2021-10-01
Supported by:
The National Key Research and Development Program of China(2020YFF0305400);The Natural Science Foundation of Beijing(4192007);The International Research Cooperation Seed Fund of Beijing University of Technology(2021B02);The International Research Cooperation Seed Fund of Beijing University of Technology(2021C02)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对现有方法难以实现确定性网络的高效部署和服务保护的问题，提出基于SRv6的确定性网络服务保护架构，以实现确定性网络的高效管控与转发。在此架构下，设计了面向服务的确定性网络服务保护方案，对基于资源共享的服务保护策略进行了建模；设计了基于最短路径的启发式算法，通过共享备份路径带宽，优化了网络资源的利用率和时延。实验结果表明，相比于非共享算法，共享保护算法具有明显优势。

关键词: 确定性网络, 分段路由, 服务保护, 故障恢复, 软件定义网络

Abstract:

To solve the problem that existing methods are difficult to achieve efficient deployment and service protection in deterministic network (DetNet), a DetNet service protection architecture based on SRv6 was proposed.By leveraging this architecture, a service-oriented DetNet protection scheme was designed and the share protection policy was formulated.With the aid of backup bandwidth share, the proposed heuristic based on shortest path optimized network resource utilization and delay.The simulation results show that the share protection algorithm achieves better performance than non-share algorithm.

Key words: deterministic network, segment routing, service protection, failure recovery, software defined network

中图分类号:

TP393

李硕朋, 方娟, 陈肯. 基于SRv6的确定性网络服务共享保护方案[J]. 通信学报, 2021, 42(10): 32-42.

Shuopeng LI, Juan FANG, Ken CHEN. DetNet service share protection scheme based on SRv6[J]. Journal on Communications, 2021, 42(10): 32-42.

图/表 15

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

图13

图14

图15

参考文献 25

[1]	黄韬, 刘江, 汪硕 ,等. 未来网络技术与发展趋势综述[J]. 通信学报, 2021,42(1): 130-150.
	HUANG T , LIU J , WANG S ,et al. Survey of the future network technology and trend[J]. Journal on Communications, 2021,42(1): 130-150.
[2]	NASRALLAH A , THYAGATURU A S , ALHARBI Z ,et al. Ultra-low latency (ULL) networks:the IEEE TSN and IETF DetNet standards and related 5G ULL research[J]. IEEE Communications Surveys ＆Tutorials, 2019,21(1): 88-145.
[3]	黄韬, 汪硕, 黄玉栋 ,等. 确定性网络研究综述[J]. 通信学报, 2019,40(6): 160-176.
	HUANG T , WANG S , HUANG Y D ,et al. Survey of the deterministic network[J]. Journal on Communications, 2019,40(6): 160-176.
[4]	NASRALLAH A , BALASUBRAMANIAN V , THYAGATURU A ,et al. TSN algorithms for large scale networks:a survey and conceptual comparison[J]. arXiv Preprint,arXiv:1905.08478, 2019.
[5]	STEINER W , CRACIUNAS S S , OLIVER R S . Traffic planning for time-sensitive communication[J]. IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, 2018,2(2): 42-47.
[6]	FINN N , THUBERT P , VARGA B ,et al. Deterministic networking architecture[R]. RFC Editor, 2019.
[7]	LI Y H , ZHANG P , ZHOU Y C ,et al. A data forwarding mechanism based on deep reinforcement learning for deterministic networks[C]// Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2020 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS). Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2020: 285-290.
[8]	VENTRE P L , SALSANO S , POLVERINI M ,et al. Segment routing:a comprehensive survey of research activities,standardization efforts,and implementation results[J]. IEEE Communications Surveys ＆ Tutorials, 2021,23(1): 182-221.
[9]	VARGA B , FARKAS J , CUMMINGS R ,et al. Flow and service information model for deterministic networking (DetNet)[R]. RFC Editor, 2021.
[10]	MALIS A , GENG X , CHEN M ,et al. Deterministic networking (DetNet) controller plane framework[R]. RFC Editor, 2020.
[11]	FARKAS J , BERGER L , MALIS A ,et al. Deterministic networking (DetNet) data plane framework[R]. RFC Editor, 2020.
[12]	FARKAS J , BERGER L , FEDYK D ,et al. Deterministic networking (DetNet) data plane:IP[R]. RFC Editor, 2020.
[13]	FARKAS J , BERGER L , MALIS A ,et al. Deterministic networking (DetNet) data plane:MPLS[R]. RFC Editor, 2021.
[14]	VARGA B , FARKAS J , MALIS A ,et al. DetNet data plane:MPLS over IEEE 802.1 time-sensitive networking (TSN)[R]. RFC Editor, 2021.
[15]	WANG X , DAI J , LIU J ,et al. DetNet data plane:IEEE 802.1 time sensitive networking over SRv6[R]. RFC Editor, 2020.
[16]	LI X Q , YEUNG K L . Traffic engineering in segment routing networks using MILP[J]. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 2020,17(3): 1941-1953.
[17]	PEREIRA V , ROCHA M , SOUSA P . Traffic engineering with three-segments routing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 2020,17(3): 1896-1909.
[18]	SCHüLLER T , ASCHENBRUCK N , CHIMANI M ,et al. Failure resiliency with only a few tunnels - enabling segment routing for traffic engineering[J]. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2020,29(1): 262-274.
[19]	TIAN Y , WANG Z L , YIN X ,et al. Traffic engineering in partially deployed segment routing over IPv6 network with deep reinforcement learning[J]. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2020,28(4): 1573-1586.
[20]	ABDELSALAM A , CLAD F , FILSFILS C ,et al. Implementation of virtual network function chaining through segment routing in a linux-based NFV infrastructure[C]// Proceedings of 2017 IEEE Conference on Network Softwarization (NetSoft). Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2017: 1-5.
[21]	MIRSKY G , CHEN M . Operations,administration and maintenance (OAM) for deterministic networks (DetNet) with MPLS data plane[R]. RFC Editor, 2021.
[22]	SHEN G X , GUO H , BOSE S K . Survivable elastic optical networks:survey and perspective (invited)[J]. Photonic Network Communications, 2016,31(1): 71-87.
[23]	YANG Z , YEUNG K L . SDN candidate selection in hybrid IP/SDN networks for single link failure protection[J]. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2020,28(1): 312-321.
[24]	YAN J L , QUAN W , JIANG X Y ,et al. Injection time planning:making CQF practical in time-sensitive networking[C]// Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2020 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2020: 616-625.
[25]	KNIGHT S , NGUYEN H X , FALKNER N ,et al. The Internet topology zoo[J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2011,29(9): 1765-1775.

基于SRv6的确定性网络服务共享保护方案

DetNet service share protection scheme based on SRv6

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 15

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王东滨, 吴东哲, 智慧, 郭昆, 张勖, 时金桥, 张宇, 陆月明. 软件定义网络抗拒绝服务攻击的流表溢出防护[J]. 通信学报, 2023, 44(2): 1-11.
[2]	沙宗轩, 霍如, 孙闯, 汪硕, 黄韬. 基于深度强化学习的转发效能感知流量调度算法[J]. 通信学报, 2022, 43(8): 30-40.
[3]	燕昺昊, 刘勤让, 沈剑良, 汤先拓, 梁栋. 软件定义网络中一种快速无循环路径迁移策略[J]. 通信学报, 2022, 43(5): 24-35.
[4]	杨思锦, 庄雷, 宋玉, 王家兴, 阳鑫宇. 多模态网络中时间敏感网络模态的智能调度机制[J]. 通信学报, 2022, 43(5): 82-91.
[5]	吴平, 常朝稳, 左志斌, 马莹莹. 基于地址重载的SDN分组转发验证[J]. 通信学报, 2022, 43(3): 88-100.
[6]	李传煌, 陈泱婷, 唐晶晶, 楼佳丽, 谢仁华, 方春涛, 王伟明, 陈超. QL-STCT：一种SDN链路故障智能路由收敛方法[J]. 通信学报, 2022, 43(2): 131-142.
[7]	贾庆民, 胡玉姣, 张华宇, 彭开来, 陈平平, 谢人超, 黄韬. 确定性算力网络研究[J]. 通信学报, 2022, 43(10): 55-64.
[8]	王鹏, 张修社, 索龙, 史可懿. 基于随机时变图的时间确定性网络路由算法[J]. 通信学报, 2021, 42(9): 21-30.
[9]	吴平, 常朝稳, 马莹莹. 基于端址重载的SDN包转发验证[J]. 通信学报, 2021, 42(7): 70-83.
[10]	常朝稳, 金建树, 韩培胜, 祝现威. 基于属性签名标识的SDN数据包转发验证方案[J]. 通信学报, 2021, 42(6): 131-144.
[11]	周启钊, 于俊清, 李冬. SDN控制层泛洪防御机制研究：检测与缓解[J]. 通信学报, 2021, 42(11): 41-53.
[12]	苏建忠, 张华宇, 朱海龙. 结合SDN控制器的TSN周期性带宽预留值计算方法[J]. 通信学报, 2021, 42(10): 23-31.
[13]	黄韬, 刘江, 汪硕, 张晨, 刘韵洁. 未来网络技术与发展趋势综述[J]. 通信学报, 2021, 42(1): 130-150.
[14]	姚蓝,兰巨龙. 基于联盟博弈的自适应SDN交换机迁移机制[J]. 通信学报, 2020, 41(8): 1-10.
[15]	王耀民,王霞,董易,张松海,施心陵. 基于斐波那契树优化算法的数据中心流量调度策略[J]. 通信学报, 2020, 41(6): 112-127.