围绕数字平台公司风险的治理制度改革分析

doi:10.11959/j.issn.2096-0271.2022063

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

随着数字经济逐步成为全球经济发展的重要支撑，数字平台公司的风险治理将成为影响各国未来经济发展的重要因素。基于对风险治理概念的分析与公司治理理论的溯源，指出了数字平台公司的治理困境。梳理了中国、日本和美国的治理制度改革理念与具体的风险治理实践。比较了这3个国家的治理制度改革，并提炼出各国在多方利益相关者之间构建风险沟通渠道的治理改革共识，最后提出了数字经济在东亚与全球范围内进行区域性合作发展面临的阻碍与可行路径建议。

关键词: 数字平台, 风险治理, 公司治理, 制度改革

Abstract:

As the digital economy is gradually becoming an important support for the development of the global economy, the risk management of digital platform companies will be an important factor affecting the future economic development of various countries.Based on the analysis of the concept of risk governance and the tracing of corporate governance theory, the governance dilemma of digital platform companies was pointed out.The governance system reform ideas and specific risk governance policies of China, Japan and the United States, had been sorted out.The governance system reforms of the three countries were compared.The consensus on governance reform of countries to build risk communication channels among multi stakeholders had been refined.Finally, the obstacles and solutions faced by the regional cooperation and development of digital economy in East Asia and the world were pointed out.

Key words: digital platform, risk management, corporate governance, system reform

中图分类号:

D90-052

赵泽睿. 围绕数字平台公司风险的治理制度改革分析[J]. 大数据, 2022, 8(4): 17-33.

Zerui ZHAO. Research on reform of governance system around the risk of digital platform companies[J]. Big Data Research, 2022, 8(4): 17-33.

图/表 5

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

参考文献 29

[1]	陈贇 . 促进我国数字经济健康快速发展[J]. 中国发展观察, 2020(23): 15-18.
	CHEN Y . Promoting the healthy and rapid development of China’s digital economy[J]. China Development Observation, 2020(23): 15-18.
[2]	尼克拉斯·卢曼 . 风险社会学[M]. 孙一洲,译. 南宁: 广西人民出版社, 2020.
	LUHMANN N . Sociology of risk[M]. Translated by SUN Y Z. Nanning: Guangxi People’s Publishing House, 2020.
[3]	BEVIR M . Governance as theory,practice,and dilemma[M]// The SAGE handbook of governance.[S.l.:s.n.], 2011: 1-16.
[4]	叶林 . 公司治理制度、理念规则与实践[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2021.
	YE L . Corporate governance system,conceptual rules and practice[M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2021.
[5]	神田秀树 . 公司法的精神[M]. 朱大明,译.. 北京: 法律出版社, 2016.
	KANDA H . The spirit of corporate law[M]. Translated by ZHU D M. Beijing: Law Press, 2016.
[6]	COASE R H . The nature of the firm[J]. Economica, 1937,4(16): 386-405.
[7]	上海证券交易所研究中心. 中国公司治理报告（2007）:利益相关者与公司社会责任[M]. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2007: 4-5.
	Shanghai Stock Exchange Research Center. China corporate governance report(2007):stakeholders and corporate social responsibility[M]. Shanghai: Fudan University Press, 2007: 4-5.
[8]	FRIEDMAN M . The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits[J]. New York Times Magazine, 1970.
[9]	水丽淑 . 经济学中的隐性价值判断分析[J]. 河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016,43(4): 73-77.
	SHUI L S . The implicit value judgments in economics[J]. Journal of Henan Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2016,43(4): 73-77.
[10]	F.W . 梅特兰.国家、信托与法人[M]. 樊安,译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2008: 66-77.
	MAITLAND F W . State,trust and corporation[M]. Translated by FAN A. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2008: 66-77.
[11]	孙翊锋 . PPP模式的治理逻辑、现实困境与发展路径:构建面向国家治理现代化的PPP模式[J]. 湖湘论坛, 2018,31(6): 142-151.
	SUN Y F . The Governance logic,realistic dilemma and development path of PPP model:constructing the PPP model for the modernization of urban governance[J]. Huxiang Forum, 2018,31(6): 142-151.
[12]	陈琤, 李丹 . PPP政策变迁与政策学习模式:1980至2015年PPP中央政策文本分析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2017(2): 102-107.
	CHEN C , LI D . Policy change and policy learning in China’s public-private partnership:content analysis of PPP policies between 1980 and 2015[J]. Chinese Public Administration, 2017(2): 102-107.
[13]	杰奥夫雷 G.帕克, 马歇尔 W.范·埃尔斯泰恩, 桑基特·保罗·邱达利 . 平台革命:改变世界的商业模式[M]. 志鹏,译. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2017: 80-85.
	PARKER G G , ALSTYNE M W V , CHOUDARY S P . Platform revolution:how networked markets are transforming the econorny and how to make them work for you[M]. Translated by ZHI P. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2017: 80-85.
[14]	TORFING J . Governance network theory:towards a second generation[J]. European Political Science, 2005,4(3): 305-315.
[15]	KOSSEFF J . Twenty years of intermediary immunity:the US experience[J]. SCRIPTed, 2017,14(1): 5-36.
[16]	王静 . 网约车给中国出租车行业及其监管带来的变革[J]. 行政管理改革, 2018(10): 41-46.
	WANG J . Transforms brought by online car-booking services to China’s taxi industry and its’ supervision[J]. Administration Reform, 2018(10): 41-46.
[17]	COHEN J E . Law for the platform economy[J]. UC Davis Law Review, 2017(51): 134.
[18]	ZUBOFF S . The age of surveillance capitalism:the fight for a human future and the new frontier of power[M]. New York: Public Affairs, 2019.
[19]	季卫东 . 决策风险、问责以及法律沟通[J]. 政法论丛, 2016(6): 3-16.
	JI W D . Risks of decisionmaking,accountability and legal communications[J]. Journal of Political Science and Law, 2016(6): 3-16.
[20]	BACHE I , FLINDERS M . Multi-level governance[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
[21]	新川达郎 . 政府的风险治理与社会信息学[J]. 社会信息学, 2016(42): 17-28.
	SHINKAWA T . Government risk governance and social informatics[J]. Social Informatics, 2016(42): 17-28.
[22]	王德迅 . 日本危机管理体制机制的运行及其特点[J]. 日本学刊, 2020(2): 1-7.
	WANG D X . The operation and characteristics of Japan’s crisis management system and mechanism[J]. Japanese Studies, 2020(2): 1-7.
[23]	张晓磊 . 日本跨境数据流动治理问题研究[J]. 日本学刊, 2021(S1): 155.
	ZHANG X L . Research on governance of cross-border data flow in Japan[J]. Japanese Studies, 2021(S1): 155.
[24]	丁曼 . 数字经济与日本网络空间治理战略[J]. 现代日本经济, 2020(1): 1-12.
	DING M . Digital economy and cyberspace governance strategy of Japan[J]. Contemporary Economy of Japan, 2020(1): 1-12.
[25]	MCSWEENY T . FTC 2.0:keeping pace with online platforms[J]. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2018,32:1027.
[26]	MALIN M H . Protecting platform workers in the gig economy[J]. Indiana Law Review, 2018,51(2): 377-411.
[27]	RICKARD L N . Pragmatic and (or) constitutive? On the foundations of contemporary risk communication research[J]. Risk Analysis, 2021,41(3): 466-479.
[28]	锁利铭 . 府际数据共享的双重困境:生成逻辑与政策启示[J]. 探索, 2020(5): 126-140,193.
	SUO L M . The double dilemma of intergovernmental data sharing:generative logic and policy enlightenment[J]. Probe, 2020(5): 126-140,193.
[29]	张红 . 大数据时代日本个人信息保护法探究[J]. 财经法学, 2020(3): 150-160.
	ZHANG H . Research on Japanese act on the protection of personal information in the era of big data[J]. Law and Economy, 2020(3): 150-160.

风险决策类型	中国政府	日本政府	美国政府
公司内部风险管理模式的制定决策	参与决策并有统一性要求	不参与	不参与
公司内部负责风险管理的专人/专岗决策	法律保障并向政府报备	不参与	不参与
面对具体风险时的公司决策	要求通过风险评估和审计向政府报备	由专门独立机构统一协调参与决策	不参与
公众获知风险决策信息及民主参与渠道的决策	政策保障	专门独立机构保障	信息披露机制保障