Peer Review Process

  • Chinese Journal of Network and Information Security operates a double blind review process.

    1. Initial review

       All manuscripts are initially evaluated by the editor. The editor uses a web-based program Academic Misconduct Literature Check (AMLC) ( which compares documents and marks similarities as a possible instance of plagiarism, and checks the suitability for the purpose and scope of the journal.

    2. Peer review

       The manuscript deemed suitable enters into the peer review process. The editorial department selects at least two expert reviewers to assess the scientific quality of the manuscript. According to the innovation, scientificness and practicability of the manuscript, reviewers evaluate the manuscript and give an objective and fair opinion. When the evaluation opinions are inconsistent, the editorial department will select another reviewer to evaluate.

    3. Final decision

       The peer review opinion is that the accepted manuscripts shall be sent to the editor-in-chief for final review, and the manuscripts shall be returned for revision, acceptance or rejection. The referees’ comments will be returned to the principal/corresponding author(s) in two months.

                                            review process 

  • 发布日期:2020-01-06 浏览: 1236
Copyright Information
Bimonthly, started in 2015
Authorized by:Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People's Republic of China
Sponsored by:Posts and Telecommunications Press
Co-sponsored by:Xidian University, Beihang University, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Zhejiang University
Edited by:Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Network and Information Security
Editor-in-Chief:FANG Bin-xing
Executive Editor-in-Chief:LI Feng-hua
Director:Xing Jianchun
Address:F2, Beiyang Chenguang Building, Shunbatiao No.1 Courtyard, Fengtai District, Beijing, China
ISSN 2096-109X
CN 10-1366/TP
Total visitors:
Visitors of today:
Now online: