基于可信度量的网络组件性能评估方法

doi:10.11959/j.issn.1000-436x.2016059

Abstract

Abstract:

For the network components selecting problem involved the process of building the new network and net-work service,a network component evaluation method was proposed based on the trustworthiness measurement and the model of the multiple attribute decision analysis.First of all,according to the flexible characteristics of the network ap-plication environment,an on-demand driven and dynamic strategy was designed for constructing trustworthiness index tree.Secondly,the uncertainty of the subjective weight was reduced by using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process,and the combination weight calculated from the subjective objective weight was used to improve the fairness of weight-ing operation.Next,in the decision stage,the evaluation results were obtained through the integrated use of processing strategies which include the index data utility transformation,the trustworthiness attribute vector construction and the calculation of vector relative approximation degree.Finally,the rationality,applicability and validity of the presented ap-proach are demonstrated with the evaluation of the software defined network controllers,and the results contribute to provide operators more decision information.

Key words: network component, trustworthiness, combination weight, network controller

Gang XIONG,Ju-long LAN,Yu-xiang HU,Shi-ran LIU. Evaluation approach for network components performance using trustworthiness measurement[J]. Journal on Communications, 2016, 37(3): 117-128.

Figures/Tables 25

指标		专家1评价			专家2评价
指标	NL₁₁	NL₁₂	NL₁₃	NL₁₁	NL₁₂	NL₁3
NL₁₁	(1,1,1)	$(\frac{1}{9}, \frac{1}{7}, \frac{1}{5})$	$(\frac{1}{7}, \frac{1}{5}, \frac{1}{3})$	(1,1,1)	(1,3,5)	(7,7,9)
NL₁₂	(5,7,9)	(1,1,1)	(3,5,7)	$(\frac{1}{5}, \frac{1}{3}, 1)$	(1,1,1)	(3,5,7)
NL₁₃	(3,5,7)	$(\frac{1}{7}, \frac{1}{5}, \frac{1}{3})$	(1,1,1)	$(\frac{1}{9}, \frac{1}{7}, \frac{1}{7})$	$(\frac{1}{7}, \frac{1}{5}, \frac{1}{3})$	(1,1,1)

权重	NA₁			NA₂		NA₃		NA₄			NA₅
权重	NL₁₁	NL₁₂	NL₁₃	NL₂₁	NL₂₂	NL₃₁	NL₃₂	NL₄₁	NL₄₂	NL₄₃	NL₅₁	NL₅₂	NL₅₃
$W_{N L}^{(1)}$	0.265 9	0.573 9	0.160 2	0.187 8	0.812 2	0.216 2	0.783 8	0.251 6	0.260 5	0.487 8	0.075 2	0.202	0.722 8
$W_{N L}^{(2)}$	0.356 4	0.321 8	0.321 8	0.5	0.5	0.079 4	0.920 6	0.648 1	0.084 7	0.267	0.321 8	0.356 4	0.321 8
WNL	0.311 1	0.447 9	0.241 0	0.343 9	0.656 1	0.147 8	0.852 2	0.449 9	0.172 6	0.377 5	0.198 5	0.279 2	0.522 3

权重	可信属性
权重	NA₁	NA₂	NA₃	NA₄	NA₅
$W_{N A}^{(1)}$	0.100 7	0.092 6	0.489 0	0.232 4	0.085 3
$W_{N A}^{(2)}$	0.137 9	0.101 1	0.272 1	0.362 8	0.126 1
W_NA	0.119 3	0.096 8	0.380 6	0.297 6	0.105 7

References 19

[1]	PAUL S , PAN J L , JAIN R . Architectures for the future works and next generation internet:a survey[J]. Computer Communications, UK, 2011,34(1): 2-42.
[2]	黄韬，刘江，霍如，等. 未来网络体系架构研究综述[J]. 通信学报， 2014,35(8): 184-197. HUANG T , LIU J , HUO R , et al. Survey of research on future network architectures[J]. Journal on Communications, 2014,35(8): 184-197.
[3]	BENGT A , CHRISTIAN D , et al. A survey of information-centric networking[J]. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2012,50(7): 26-36.
[4]	XIE , SUN Y , ZHANG Y , et al. Service oriented future Internet archi-tecture[C]// INFOCOM Poster. Shanghai,China, c2011.
[5]	MCKEOWN N , ANDERSON T , BALAKRISHNAN H , et al. Open-Flow:enabling innovation in campus networks[J]. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2008,38(2): 69-74.
[6]	SHIN S , PORRAS P , YEGNESWARAN V , et al. FRESCO:modular composable security services for software-defined networks[C]// The 20th Annual Network and Distributed System Security Sympo-sium(NDSS). c2013.
[7]	郜帅，王洪超，王凯，等. 智慧网络组件协同机制研究[J]. 电子学报， 2013,41(7): 1261-1267. GAO S , WANG H H , WANG K , et al. Research on cooperation me-chanisms of smart network components[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2013,41(7): 1261-1267.
[8]	兰巨龙，程东年，胡宇翔 . 可重构信息通信基础网络体系研究[J]. 通信学报， 2014,35(1): 64-76. LAN J L , CHENG D N , HU Y X . Research on reconfigurable infor-mation communication basal network architecture[J]. Journal on Communications, 2014,35(1): 64-76.
[9]	习宁，马建峰，孙聪，等. 基于模型检测的服务链信息流安全可组合验证方法[J]. 通信学报， 2014,35(11): 23-31. XI N , MA J F , SUN C , et al. Composable information flow verification for service chain based on model checking[J]. Journal on Communica-tions, 2014,35(11): 23-31.
[10]	SYED A S , JANNET F , MAHAM F , et al. An architectural evaluation of SDN controllers[C]// IEEE ICC-Next-Generation Networking Symposium. c2013:23-31.
[11]	杨善林，丁帅，褚伟 . 一种基于效用和证据理论的可信软件评估方法[J]. 计算机研究与发展， 2009,46(7): 1152-1159. YANG S L , DING S , CHU W . Trustworthy software evaluation using utility based evidence theory[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development. 2009,46(7): 1152-1159.
[12]	SHI L , YANG S L , LI K , et al. Developing an evaluation approach for software trustworthiness using combination weights and TOPSIS[J]. Journal of Software, 2012,7(3): 532-543.
[13]	丁帅 . 软件可行性评估模型及其优化方法研究[D]. 合肥：合肥工业大学， 2011. DING S . Research on software trustworthiness evaluation model and its optimization[D]. Hefei: Hefei University of Technology, 2011.
[14]	周剑，张明新 . 软件可信评估综述[J]. 计算机应用研究， 2012,29(10): 3609-3613. ZHOU J , ZHANG M X . Survey on trustworthy software eval tion[J]. Application Research of Computers. 2012,29(10): 3609-3613.
[15]	郎波，刘旭东，王怀民，等. 一种软件可信分级模型[J]. 计算机科学与探索， 2010,4(3): 231-239. LANG B , LIU X D , WANG H M , et al. A classification model for software trustworthiness[J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2010,4(3): 231-239.
[16]	韩中庚 . 数学建模方法及其应用[M]. 北京：高等教育出版社， 2005. HAN Z G . Mathematical modeling methods and application[M]. Bei-jing: Higher Education Press, 2005.
[17]	左青云，陈鸣，赵广松，等. 基于 OpenFlow 的 SDN 技术研究[J]. 软件学报， 2013,24(5): 1078-1097. ZUO Q Y , CHEN M , ZHAO G S , et al. Research on openflow-based SDN technologies[J]. Journal of Software, 2013,24(5): 1078-1097.
[18]	房秉毅，张歌，张云勇，等. 开源SDN控制器发展现状研究[J]. 邮电设计技术， 2014,(7):29-36. FANG B Y , ZHANG G , ZHANG Y Y , et al. Research on the develop-ment of open source SDN controller[J]. Designing Techniques of Posts and Telecommunications, 2014,(7):29-36.
[19]	江国龙，付斌章，陈明宇，等. SDN 控制器的调研和量化分析[J]. 计算机科学与探索， 2014,8(6): 653-664. JIANG G L , FU B Z , CHEN M Y , et al. Survey and quantitative analysis of SDN controllers[J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2014,8(6): 653-664.

Metrics

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

a%ij	TFN含义及取值
同等重要	(1,1,3)
稍微重要	(1,3,5)
明显重要	(3,5,7)
强烈重要	(5,7,9)
极端重要	(7,9,9)

数据d^S	TFN
Worst(W)	(0.0,0.0,0.0)
Poor(P)	(0.0,0.0,3.0)
Average(A)	(3.0,4.5,6.0)
Good(G)	(6.0,7.5,8.5)
Excellent(E)	(8.5,9.0,9.5)
Top(T)	(9.5,10,10)

h_t 区间	可信等级
[0,0.2)	较弱
[0.2,0.4)	一般
[0.4,0.6)	较好
[0.6,0.8)	很好
[0.8,1]	极好

名称	编号					S						O
名称	编号	NL₁₁	NL₁₂	NL₁₃	NL₂₁	NL₂₂	NL₃₁	NL₅₁	NL₅₂	NL₅₃	NL₃₂	NL₄₁	NL₄₂₁	NL₄₂₂
NOX	I1	G	E	G	T	G	E	G	G	E	0.3	0.015	12	350
Beacon	I2	T	T	E	E	T	E	E	T	E	0.2	0.01	16	1 300
Maestro	I3	T	E	E	G	E	G	E	T	G	0.2	0.013	20	500
Floodlight	I4	T	T	T	E	T	T	T	T	T	0.15	0.023	10	600
Ryu	I5	E	G	T	T	E	T	T	E	T	0.1	0.14	30	100

实例编号		可信指标
实例编号	NL₁₁	NL₁₂	NL₁₃
I1	0.160 6	0.198 9	0.163 9
I2	0.214 8	0.219 2	0.198 9
I3	0.214 8	0.198 9	0.198 9
I4	0.214 8	0.219 2	0.219 2
I5	0.194 9	0.163 9	0.219 2

Evaluation approach for network components performance using trustworthiness measurement

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 25

References 19

Related Articles 6

Metrics

Recommended 0

实例	可信指标及其可信值
实例	NL₁₁	NL₁₂	NL₁₃	NL₂₁	NL₂₂	NL₃₁	NL₃₂	NL₄₁	NL₄₂₁	NL₄₂₂	NL₅₁	NL₅₂	NL₅₃
I1	0	0.633	0	1	0	0.633	0	0.962	0.9	0.208	0	0	0.633
I2	1	1	0.633	0.633	1	0.633	0.5	1	0.7	1	0.633	1	0.633
I3	1	0.633	0.633	0	0.633	0	0.5	0.977	0.5	0.333	0.633	1	0
I4	1	1	1	0.633	1	1	0.75	0.9	1	0.417	1	1	1
I5	0.633	0	1	0.633	0.633	1	1	0	0	0	1	0.633	1

评估指标	控制器组件实例
评估指标	I1	I2	I3	I4	I5
相对近似度h	0.311 6	0.713 0	0.525 2	0.810 2	0.651 0

[1]	Junfeng TIAN,Yuhui GUO. Software behavior trust forecast model based on check point scene information [J]. Journal on Communications, 2018, 39(9): 147-158.
[2]	Zhen LI,Jun-feng TIAN,Zhuo CHANG,Xiao-xue MA. Distributed software monitoring and trustworthiness evaluation based on checkpoints [J]. Journal on Communications, 2016, 37(3): 7-19.
[3]	. Research on trustworthiness measurement approaches of component based BPRAS [J]. Journal on Communications, 2014, 35(3): 6-57.
[4]	Qiang HAN,Yu-yu YUAN. Research on trustworthiness measurement approaches of component based BPRAS [J]. Journal on Communications, 2014, 35(3): 47-57.
[5]	Guang-yuan SHI,Chang-xiang SHEN,Yi LIU. Dynamical attestation for trust based on secure virtual machine introspection [J]. Journal on Communications, 2011, 32(11A): 24-38.
[6]	Sheng-hui ZHAO,Guo-xin WU,Gui-lin CHEN,Hai-bao CHEN. Service selection approach for enhancing trustworthiness of Web service [J]. Journal on Communications, 2011, 32(1): 37-45.

指标	权重
指标	W° ⁽¹⁾₁	W ⁽¹⁾₁
NL₁₁	(0.269 7,0.266 9,0.258 1)	0.265 9
NL₁₂	(0.561 0,0.5724,0.592 9)	0.573 9
NL₁₃	(0.169 3,0.160 7,0.149 0)	0.160 2

实例	可信属性
实例	功能属性	可靠属性	安全属性	时效属性	易使用属性
I1	0.284	0.344	0.094	0.667	0.331
I2	0.912	0.874	0.520	0.948	0.736
I3	0.747	0.416	0.426	0.652	0.405
I4	1	0.874	0.787	0.735	1
I5	0.438	0.759	1	0	0.898

实例	可信属性
实例	功能属性	可靠属性	安全属性	时效属性	易使用属性
I1	0.033 8	0.033 3	0.035 6	0.198 4	0.035 0
I2	0.108 8	0.084 6	0.197 8	0.282 2	0.077 8
I3	0.089 2	0.040 2	0.162 2	0.193 9	0.042 8
I4	0.119 3	0.084 6	0.299 5	0.218 7	0.105 7
I5	0.052 3	0.073 5	0.380 6	0	0.094 9