“科学学”视角下的科研工作者行为研究

doi:10.11959/j.issn.2096-0271.2019040

Abstract

Abstract:

The complexity of science,the data availability and the need for better understanding of science promote the research in an emerging field of “Science of Science”.To understand the regularities in science,we need to first understand the behavior patterns of scientists.A few related works were reviewed and introduced,including research interest evolution,internal microscopic driven force in scientific collaboration,the difference of research tuandui and research team,and the multidimensional measure of a scholar’s performance to prevent academic gaming.The results obtained will provide theoretical tools and empirical supports for practical issues related with research policy and research evaluation.

Key words: Science of Science, scientific collaboration, research evaluation, academia profile

CLC Number:

TP39

Tao JIA, Feng XIA. Quantifying patterns in the behavior of scientists in Science of Science study[J]. Big Data Research, 2019, 5(5): 38-47.

Figures/Tables 3

References 37

[1]	KUHN T S . The structure of scientific revolutions[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago PressPress, 2012.
[2]	DE SOLLA P D J . Little science,big science and beyond[M]. New York: Columbia University PressPress, 1986.
[3]	SINATRA R , WANG D , DEVILLE P ,et al. Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact[J]. Science, 2016,354(6312):5239.
[4]	DA SILVA J A T . Does China need to rethink its metrics-and citationbased research rewards policies[J]. Scientometrics, 2017,112(3): 1853-1857.
[5]	AZOULAY P , GRAFF-ZIVIN J , UZZI B ,et al. Toward a more scientific science[J]. Science, 2018,361(6408): 1194-1197.
[6]	JONES B F , WUCHTY S , UZZI B . Multiuniversity research teams:shifting impact,geography,and stratification in science[J]. Science, 2008,322(5905): 1259-1262.
[7]	WUCHTY S , JONES B F , UZZI B . The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge[J]. Science, 2007,316(5827): 1036-1039.
[8]	ZENG A , SHEN Z S , ZHOU J L ,et al. The Science of Science:from the perspective of complex systems[J]. Physics ReportsReview Section of Physics Letters, 2017(714-715): 1-73.
[9]	FORTUNATO S , BERGSTROM C T B?RNER K ,et al. Science of science[J]. Science, 2018,359(6379).
[10]	钱学森 . 希望[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 1981(1):7.
	QIAN X S . Hope[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.＆.T., 1981(1):7.
[11]	WANG D , SONG C , BARABáSI A L . Quantifying long-term scientific impact[J]. Science, 2013,342(6154): 127-132.
[12]	HSIEHCHEN D , ESPINOZA M , HSIEH A . Multinational teams and diseconomies of scale in collaborative research[J]. Science Advances, 2015,1(8):e1500211.
[13]	RZHETSKY A , FOSTER J G , FOSTER I T ,et al. Choosing experiments to accelerate collective discovery[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015,112(47): 14569-14574.
[14]	JIA T , WANG D , SZYMANSKI B K . Quantifying patterns of research-interest evolution[J]. Nature Human Behaviour, 2017,1(4):78.
[15]	WAY S F , MORGAN A C , CLAUSET A ,et al. The misleading narrative of the canonical faculty productivity trajectory[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017,114(44): 9216-9223.
[16]	WU L , WANG D , EVANS J A . Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology[J]. Nature, 2019,566(7744): 378-382.
[17]	XIE Y , ZHANG C , LAI Q . China’s rise as a major contributor to science and technology[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014,111(26): 9437-9442.
[18]	HUANG F . Quality deficit belies the hype[J]. Nature, 2018,564(7735):70.
[19]	KUHN T S . The essential tension[J]. American Journal of Physics, 1979,47(6): 568-569.
[20]	AZOULAY P , GRAFF ZIVIN J S , MANSO G . Incentives and creativity:evidence from the academic life sciences[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 2011,42(3): 527-554.
[21]	TIAN X , WANG T Y . Tolerance for failure and corporate innovation[J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2014,27(1): 211-255.
[22]	FOSTER J G , RZHETSKY A , EVANS J A . Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies[J]. American Sociological Review, 2015,80(5): 875-908.
[23]	TANG J , ZHANG J , YAO L ,et al. Arnetminer:extraction and mining of academic social networks[C]// The 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining,August 24-27,2008,Las Vegas,USA. New York:ACM Press, 2018: 990-998.
[24]	XIA F , WANG W , BEKELE T M ,et al. Big scholarly data:a survey[J]. IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 2017,3(1): 18-35.
[25]	RZHETSKY A , FOSTER J G , FOSTER I T ,et al. Choosing experiments to accelerate collective discovery[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015,112(47): 14569-14574.
[26]	COKOL M , IOSSIFOV I , WEINREB C ,et al. Emergent behavior of growing knowledge about molecular interactions[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2005,23(10): 1243-1247.
[27]	KABO F W , COTTON-NESSLER N , HWANG Y ,et al. Proximity effects on the dynamics and outcomes of scientific collaborations[J]. Research Policy, 2014,43(9): 1469-1485.
[28]	LEAHEY E . From sole investigator to team scientist:trends in the practice and study of research collaboration[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 2016,42(1): 81-100.
[29]	WANG W , YU S , BEKELE T M ,et al. Scientific collaboration patterns vary with scholars’ academic ages[J]. Scientometrics, 2017,112(1): 329-343.
[30]	WANG W , LIU J , YANG Z ,et al. Sustainable collaborator recommendation based on conference closure[J]. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 2019,6(2): 311-322.
[31]	National Research Council . Enhancing the effectiveness of team science[M]. Pittsburgh: National Academies PressPress, 2015.
[32]	方文东 . 关于科研团队组建的一些认识[J]. 科技管理研究, 2002,22(4): 42-43.
	FANG W D . The attitude about organizing scientific research group[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2002,22(4): 42-43.
[33]	WANG J , HICKS D . Scientific teams:selfassembly,fluidness,and interdependence[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2015,9(1): 197-207.
[34]	LEE Y N , WALSH J P , WANG J . Creativity in scientific teams:unpacking novelty and impact[J]. Research Policy, 2015,44(3): 684-697.
[35]	DONG Y , MA H , TANG J ,et al. Collaboration diversity and scientific impact[J]..03694. Computer Science,2018,arXiv:1806.03694.
[36]	YU S , XIA F , ZHANG K ,et al. Team recognition in big scholarly data:exploring collaboration intensity[C]// 2017 IEEE 15th International Conference on Dependable,Autonomic and Secure Computing,September 17-21,2017,St.Petersburg,USA. Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2017: 925-932.
[37]	BIAGIOLI M , KENNEY M , MARTIN B ,et al. Academic misconduct,misrepresentation and gaming:a reassessment[J]. Research Policy, 2018.

Metrics

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

Quantifying patterns in the behavior of scientists in Science of Science study

RichHTML

PDF下载

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 3

References 37

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Recommended 0

[1]	Yazhen YE, Yangyong ZHU. Digital transformation service platform:enhancing enterprise competitiveness in a new competitive situation [J]. Big Data Research, 2023, 9(3): 3-14.
[2]	Doudou LIU, Baochen JIAO. Research on data asset cataloging of colleges and universities [J]. Big Data Research, 2023, 9(3): 71-84.
[3]	Hao WANG, Yushan PAN, Yi PAN. Generative AI empowered metaverse organisms: prospects and challenges [J]. Big Data Research, 2023, 9(3): 85-96.
[4]	Yadong WU, Jiaming CHEN, Yan LUO, Xuefeng WANG, Dechun HUANG, Chao NI, Jiming LAN, Suiqun LI, Weihan ZHANG, Wei DAI. An overview of Caideng metaverse research [J]. Big Data Research, 2023, 9(3): 97-113.
[5]	Yimin DENG, Xulong ZHANG, Shijing SI, Jianzong WANG, Jing XIAO. Human avatars synthesis technologies: a survey [J]. Big Data Research, 2023, 9(3): 114-139.
[6]	Jingwen LI, Yawen LI. Research on algorithm and application risk and its governance [J]. Big Data Research, 2023, 9(3): 140-149.
[7]	. Intelligent Wearable Devices in Marvel Cinematic Universe [J]. Big Data Research, 2023, 9(3): 181-183.
[8]	Xiaojun WAN. Intelligent text generation: recent advances and challenges [J]. Big Data Research, 2023, 9(2): 99-109.
[9]	Zeyu WANG, Ailin LYU, Shu YAN. Research on the regularity of data factor formation and value release [J]. Big Data Research, 2023, 9(2): 33-45.
[10]	. Data finance as the public advantages in the development of digital economy [J]. Big Data Research, 2023, 9(2): 163-166.
[11]	. Turing test in Marvel Cinematic Universe [J]. Big Data Research, 2023, 9(2): 167-169.
[12]	Huicong JIAO, Wenju LIU, Ze WANG. Trajectory differential privacy protection method based on exponential mechanism [J]. Big Data Research, 2023, 9(1): 141-152.
[13]	Qingyin LIN, Zhiguang CHEN. A hot-update-aware optimization to the query of LSM-Tree [J]. Big Data Research, 2023, 9(1): 126-140.
[14]	Hong MEI, Xiaoyong DU, Hai JIN, Xueqi CHENG, Yunpeng CHAI, Xuanhua SHI, Xiaolong JIN, Yasha WANG, Chi LIU. Big data technologies forward-looking [J]. Big Data Research, 2023, 9(1): 1-20.
[15]	Yayun HE, Junqing PENG, Jianzong WANG, Jing XIAO. Rhythm dancer: 3D dance generation by keymotion transition graph and pose-interpolation network [J]. Big Data Research, 2023, 9(1): 23-37.