面向认知通信防护的穿透式干扰效能评估方法

doi:10.11959/j.issn.1000-436x.2023195

通信学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (11): 161-172.doi: 10.11959/j.issn.1000-436x.2023195

• 学术论文 • 上一篇

面向认知通信防护的穿透式干扰效能评估方法

孙志国¹, 肖硕¹, 吴毅杰², 李诗铭², 王震铎¹

¹ 哈尔滨工程大学通信与信息工程学院，黑龙江哈尔滨 150001
² 上海航天电子技术研究所，上海 201109

修回日期:2023-10-09 出版日期:2023-11-01 发布日期:2023-11-01
作者简介:孙志国（1977− ），男，黑龙江哈尔滨人，博士，哈尔滨工程大学教授、博士生导师，主要研究方向为认知数据链、无线通信与防护
肖硕（1999− ），男，黑龙江哈尔滨人，哈尔滨工程大学硕士生，主要研究方向为数据链干扰效能评估
吴毅杰（1984− ），男，福建漳州人，上海航天电子技术研究所高级工程师，主要研究方向为测控通信相关技术
李诗铭（1994− ），女，黑龙江齐齐哈尔人，上海航天电子技术研究所工程师，主要研究方向为数据链相关通信技术
王震铎（1989− ），男，黑龙江哈尔滨人，博士，哈尔滨工程大学副教授、硕士生导师，主要研究方向为变换域通信理论与技术、数据链关键技术及其干扰效能评估方法
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(62001138)

Evaluation method of penetrating jamming effectiveness for cognitive communication protection

Zhiguo SUN¹, Shuo XIAO¹, Yijie WU², Shiming LI², Zhenduo WANG¹

¹ College of Information and Communication Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
² Shanghai Institute of Aerospace Electronics Technology, Shanghai 201109, China

Revised:2023-10-09 Online:2023-11-01 Published:2023-11-01
Supported by:
The National Natural Science Foundation of China(62001138)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在认知通信对抗场景下，为了支撑“通信模块/参数与干扰的多维正交配置式通信防护”的实施，干扰效能需要具备模块级响应能力，提出一种穿透式干扰效能评估方法。首先，选取各信号处理模块的核心参数作为评估参量；然后，采用层次分析法和熵权法确定指标权重，通过专家权重分配解决了层次分析法中的协同问题，通过非均匀映射解决了熵权法中的权重分配问题；最后，通过博弈论权衡主客观权重，利用优劣解距离法判断干扰效能；并对 Link16 数据链的干扰效能进行评估实验，综合考虑了干扰类型、干扰频点个数、干扰时间和系统类型等多个方面。实验结果表明，穿透式干扰效能评估方法不仅可以直观展示评估结果与指标参数之间的关系，而且具有良好的干扰区分能力。

关键词: 穿透式效能评估, 组合赋权, 博弈论, 优劣解距离法, 干扰效能评估

Abstract:

In order to support the implementation of “multidimensional orthogonal configured communication protection between communication modules as well as parameters and interference” in cognitive communication countermeasures scenarios, jamming effectiveness requires module level responsiveness.A penetrating jamming effectiveness evaluation method was proposed.Firstly, the core parameters of each signal processing module were selected as evaluation parameters.Secondly, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and entropy weight method (EWM) were used to determine the weight of indicators.The coordination problem in AHP was solved through expert weight allocation, and the weight allocation problem in EWM was solved through non-uniform mapping.Finally, the subjective and objective weights were weighed through game theory, and the jamming effectiveness was judged by the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS).By conducting evaluation experiments on the jamming performance of the Link16 data link, taking into account multiple aspects such as jamming types, number of jamming frequencies, jamming duration, and system types.Experiment results demonstrate that the penetration-based jamming performance evaluation method not only provides a more intuitive representation of the relationship between evaluation results and metric parameters, but also possesses excellent jamming discrimination capability.

Key words: penetrating effectiveness evaluation, combination weighting, game theory, TOPSIS, jamming effectiveness evaluation

中图分类号:

TN92

孙志国, 肖硕, 吴毅杰, 李诗铭, 王震铎. 面向认知通信防护的穿透式干扰效能评估方法[J]. 通信学报, 2023, 44(11): 161-172.

Zhiguo SUN, Shuo XIAO, Yijie WU, Shiming LI, Zhenduo WANG. Evaluation method of penetrating jamming effectiveness for cognitive communication protection[J]. Journal on Communications, 2023, 44(11): 161-172.

图/表 13

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表1

图6

表2

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

参考文献 21

[1]	王桂胜, 黄国策, 王叶群 ,等. 基于认知驱动的变换域通信智能抗干扰方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021,43(1): 223-231.
	WANG G S , HUANG G C , WANG Y Q ,et al. Anti-interference method with intelligence for transform domain communication based on cognitive-engine[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021,43(1): 223-231.
[2]	吕斌, 曹怡, 李健 ,等. IRS辅助的认知反向散射通信网络性能增强方案[J]. 通信学报, 2021,42(12): 172-181.
	LYU B , CAO Y , LI J ,et al. Performance enhancement scheme for IRS-assisted cognitive backscatter communication network[J]. Journal on Communications, 2021,42(12): 172-181.
[3]	杨宏宇, 袁海航, 张良 . 基于攻击图的主机安全评估方法[J]. 通信学报, 2022,43(2): 89-99.
	YANG H Y , YUAN H H , ZHANG L . Host security assessment method based on attack graph[J]. Journal on Communications, 2022,43(2): 89-99.
[4]	林云, 徐怀韬, 王森 ,等. 基于特征融合的通信语音干扰效果客观评估[J]. 通信学报, 2023,44(3): 105-116.
	LIN Y , XU H T , WANG S ,et al. Objective assessment of communication speech interference effect based on feature fusion[J]. Journal on Communications, 2023,44(3): 105-116.
[5]	SHAO R R , FANG Z G , GAO S ,et al. G-BDP-ADC model for effectiveness evaluation of low orbit satellite communication system in the context of poor information[J]. IEEE Access, 2019,7: 157489-157505.
[6]	施端阳, 林强, 胡冰 ,等. 综合评估方法研究综述[J]. 中国科技信息, 2022(22): 124-127.
	SHI D Y , LIN Q , HU B ,et al. A summary of research on comprehensive evaluation methods[J]. China Science and Technology Information, 2022(22): 124-127.
[7]	WANG Y , HAO J M , LIU W P ,et al. Dynamic evaluation of GNSS spoofing and jamming efficacy based on game theory[J]. IEEE Access, 2020,8: 13845-13857.
[8]	王巍, 赵铁军, 辛国栋 ,等. 基于层次分析模型的产品多属性综合排序[J]. 通信学报, 2016,37(5): 88-94.
	WANG W , ZHAO T J , XIN G D ,et al. Multiattribute ranking based on analytic hierarchy model[J]. Journal on Communications, 2016,37(5): 88-94.
[9]	杨爱民, 高放, 边敏华 ,等. 基于层次分析—模糊评价的云计算安全评估与对策[J]. 通信学报, 2016,37(S1): 104-110.
	YANG A M , GAO F , BIAN M H ,et al. Cloud computing security evaluation and countermeasure based on AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Journal on Communications, 2016,37(S1): 104-110.
[10]	WU S H , XIE J , LIU X D ,et al. Marginal optimization method to improve the inconsistent comparison matrix in the analytic hierarchy process[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017,28(6): 1141-1151.
[11]	FENG J F , ZHANG Q , HU J H ,et al. Dynamic assessment method of air target threat based on improved GIFSS[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019,30(3): 525-534.
[12]	LIN H F , DU L , LIU Y F . Soft decision cooperative spectrum sensing with entropy weight method for cognitive radio sensor networks[J]. IEEE Access, 2020,8: 109000-109008.
[13]	吴占稳, 张文 . 改进熵权法及其在起重机安全评价中的应用[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2022,38(1): 207-210.
	WU Z W , ZHANG W . Improved entropy method and its application in crane safety evaluation[J]. Machine Design ＆ Research, 2022,38(1): 207-210.
[14]	ZHANG Z C , CHEN L . Analysis on decision-making model of plan evaluation based on grey relation projection and combination weight algorithm[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018,29(4): 789-796.
[15]	LIU H C , WANG L E , LI Z W ,et al. Improving risk evaluation in FMEA with cloud model and hierarchical TOPSIS method[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2019,27(1): 84-95.
[16]	宁晓燕, 王影, 孙志国 ,等. 多音干扰下 Nakagami-m 信道传输Link16 数据链的性能分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023,45(2): 566-571.
	NING X Y , WANG Y , SUN Z G ,et al. Performance analysis of Nakagami-m channel transmission Link16 under multi-tone interference[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023,45(2): 566-571.
[17]	CHEN Z , ZHAI R , LI D C ,et al. Performance evaluation of a tactical data-link system based on MSK and 16QAM[J]. IEEE Access, 2021,9: 84316-84326.
[18]	吴月娴, 葛临东, 许志勇 . 常用数字调制信号识别的一种新方法[J]. 电子学报, 2007,35(4): 782-785.
	WU Y X , GE L D , XU Z Y . A novel identification method for commonly used digital modulations[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2007,35(4): 782-785.
[19]	尹柏强, 王署东, 何怡刚 ,等. 基于快速 S 变换时频空间模型的电磁干扰复杂度评估方法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2019,41(1): 195-201.
	YIN B Q , WANG S D , HE Y G ,et al. Electromagnetic environment complex evaluation algorithm based on fast S-transform and time-frequency space model[J]. Journal of Electronics ＆ Information Technology, 2019,41(1): 195-201.
[20]	YIN H H , SUN J X , YU H ,et al. Research on performance of orthogonal convolutional codes with ultra-low code rate in spread spectrum communication[C]// Proceedings of 2021 IEEE 4th Advanced Information Management,Communicates,Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IMCEC). Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2021: 457-461.
[21]	罗海玲, 宁晓燕, 郭凯丰 ,等. 基于OCML构造序列的Link16扩频方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022,44(12): 3837-3842.
	LUO H L , NING X Y , GUO K F ,et al. Link16 spread spectrum method based on OCML construction sequence[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022,44(12): 3837-3842.

指标参数	值
c₁	0.156 3
c₂	0.115
c₃	0.125
d₁	0.010 7
d₂	0.111 1
d₃	0.483 9

改进	熵值	熵权分配
否	0.999 6;0.999 7;0.999 8;0.999 9	0.4;0.3;0.2;0.1
	0.996;0.997;0.998;0.999	0.4;0.3;0.2;0.1
	0.96;0.97;0.98;0.99	0.4;0.3;0.2;0.1
	0.6;0.7;0.8;0.9	0.4;0.3;0.2;0.1
是	0.999 6;0.999 7;0.999 8;0.999 9	0.250 1;0.250 0;0.250 0;0.250 1
	0.996;0.997;0.998;0.999	0.251 1;0.250 4;0.249 6;0.248 9
	0.96;0.97;0.98;0.99	0.261 0;0.253 7;0.246 3;0.239 0
	0.6;0.7;0.8;0.9	0.336 7;0.278 9;0.221 1;0.163 3

面向认知通信防护的穿透式干扰效能评估方法

Evaluation method of penetrating jamming effectiveness for cognitive communication protection

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 21

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0

[1]	冯智斌, 徐煜华, 杜智勇, 刘鑫, 李文, 韩昊, 张晓博. 对抗智能干扰的主动防御技术[J]. 通信学报, 2022, 43(10): 42-54.
[2]	张红斌, 尹彦, 赵冬梅, 刘滨. 基于威胁情报的网络安全态势感知模型[J]. 通信学报, 2021, 42(6): 182-194.
[3]	赵临东,庄文芹,陈建新,周亮. 异构蜂窝网络中分层任务卸载：建模与优化[J]. 通信学报, 2020, 41(4): 34-44.
[4]	李沓,田有亮,向康,高鸿峰. 委托计算下基于区块链的公平支付方案[J]. 通信学报, 2020, 41(3): 80-90.
[5]	曾锋,王润华,彭佳,陈志刚. 口碑参与模式下移动众包网络的用户博弈研究[J]. 通信学报, 2019, 40(3): 125-138.
[6]	单芳芳,李晖,朱辉. 基于博弈论的社交网络转发控制机制[J]. 通信学报, 2018, 39(3): 172-180.
[7]	曹傧,梁裕丞,罗雷,唐述. ad hoc云环境中分布式博弈卸载策略[J]. 通信学报, 2017, 38(11): 24-34.
[8]	贾亚男,岳殿武. 认知小蜂窝网络中基于能效的下行资源分配算法[J]. 通信学报, 2016, 37(4): 116-127.
[9]	曹傧,郎文强,陈卓,李云. 无线网络虚拟化中资源共享的功率分配算法[J]. 通信学报, 2016, 37(2): 64-72.
[10]	田有亮,王雪梅,刘琳芳. 基于马尔可夫决策的理性秘密共享方案[J]. 通信学报, 2015, 36(9): 222-229.
[11]	胡松华,张建军,陆阳,刘斌,韩江洪. 基于博弈论功率控制的串行干扰消除算法[J]. 通信学报, 2015, 36(9): 215-221.
[12]	王洁,蔡永泉,田有亮. 基于博弈论的门限签名体制分析与构造[J]. 通信学报, 2015, 36(5): 148-155.
[13]	郭晶晶,马建峰,李琦,万涛,高聪,张亮. 基于博弈论的移动自组织网络的信任管理方法[J]. 通信学报, 2014, 35(11): 50-58.
[14]	郭晶晶，马建峰，李琦，万涛，高聪，张亮. 基于博弈论的移动自组织网络的信任管理方法[J]. 通信学报, 2014, 35(11): 6-49.
[15]	杨卫东1,2，何云华2,3，孙利民2,3. 车载自组网节点轨迹隐私攻防博弈模型[J]. 通信学报, 2013, 34(Z1): 32-245.