基于SDN的电邮抵赖源头抑制方法

doi:10.11959/j.issn.1000-436x.2016178

Abstract

Abstract:

With the limitation of controllability of the existing Internet architecture,the existing secure e-mail technology such as certified e-mail can only post detection but cannot source restraining on e-mail repudiation.Based on the idea of control and data separation of software-defined networking technology,by means of bypass attaching customized repudiation restrain unit to the traditional e-mail model.An e-mail repudiation source restraining method was proposed without destroying the existing e-mail structure.After presenting e-mail evidence binding protocol,repudiation behavior detection algorithm,certified reputation evaluation model,and repudiation restraining strategy formation algorithm embedded in repudiation restrain unit,the effectiveness were tested of the proposed method in 4 cross scenarios.The experimental results show that,under the premise of compatibility with the current e-mail system,the method can source restrain e-mail repudiation effectively.

Key words: e-mail repudiation, source restraining, SDN, certified e-mail

Zhi-geng HAN,Xia FENG,Geng CHEN. SDN based e-mail repudiation source restraining method[J]. Journal on Communications, 2016, 37(9): 55-67.

Figures/Tables 13

References 24

[1]	WELLS T M , DENNIS A R . To e-mail or not to e-mail:the impact of media on psychophysiological responses and emotional content in utilitarian and romantic communication[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2016,54: 1-9.
[2]	TAUBER A . A survey of certified mail systems provided on the Internet[J]. Computers & Security, 2011,30: 464-485.
[3]	FERRER-GOMILLA J L , ONIEVA J A , PAYERAS M ,et al. Certified electronic mail:properties revisited[J]. Computers & Security, 2010,29(2): 167-179.
[4]	KIM H , FEAMSTER N . Improving network management with software defined networking[J]. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2013,51(2): 114-119.
[5]	ALI S T , SIVARAMAN V , RADFORD A ,et al. A survey of securing networks using software defined networking[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2015,64(3): 1086-1097.
[6]	BECHTOLD S , PERRIG A . Accountability in future Internet architectures[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2014,57(9): 21-23.
[7]	WANG Y , SUSILO W , AU MH ,et al. Collusion-resistance in optimistic fair exchange[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2014,9(8): 1227-1239.
[8]	ONIEVA J A , ZHOU J , LOPEZ J . Enhancing certified e-mail service for timeliness and multicast[C]// 2004 International Network Conference. Plymouth,UK, 2004: 327-336.
[9]	MICALI S , . Simple and fast optimistic protocols for fair electronic exchange[C]// The twenty-second annual symposium on Principles of distributed computing. Boston,USA, 2003: 12-19.
[10]	SHAO MH , WANG G , ZHOU J . Some common attacks against certified e-mail protocols and the countermeasures[J]. Computer Communications, 2006,29(15): 2759-2769.
[11]	PAYERAS-CAPELLà M M , MUT-PUIGSERVER M , FERRER-GOMILA J L ,et al. No author based selective receipt in an efficient certified e-mail protocol[C]// 2009 17th Euromicro International Conference on Parallel,Distributed and Network-based Processing. Weimar, 2009: 387-392.
[12]	PUIGSERVER M M , GOMILA J L F , ROTGER L H . Certified electronic mail protocol resistant to a minority of malicious third parties[C]// Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE INFOCOM 2000). 2000: 1401-1405.
[13]	ATENIESE G , MEDEIROS BD , GOODRICH MT . TRICERT:a distributed certified e-mail schemes[C]// 2001 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium. San Diego,USA, 2001.
[14]	ZHOU J , ONIEVA J , LOPEZ J . Optimized multi-party certified e-mail protocols[J]. Information Management & Computer Security, 2005,13(5): 350-366.
[15]	WANG C , LAN C , NIU S ,et al. An ID-based certified e-mail protocol with STTP suitable for wireless mobile environments[J]. Journal of Computers, 2013,8(1): 3-9.
[16]	TAUBER A , APITZSCH J , BOLDRIN L . An interoperability standard for certified mail systems[J]. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 2012,34: 452-466.
[17]	TAUBER A , KUSTOR P , KARNING B . Cross-border certified electronic mailing:a European perspective[J]. Computer Law & Security Review, 2013,29(1): 28-39.
[18]	DRAPER-GIL G , FERRER-GOMILA JL , HINAREJOS MF ,et al. An optimistic certified e-mail protocol for the current Internet e-mail architecture[C]// 2014 IEEE Conference on Communications and Network Security(CNS). San Francisco, 2014: 382-390.
[19]	PAULIN A , WELZER T . A universal system for fair non-repudiable certified e-mail without a trusted third party[J]. Computers & Security, 2013,32: 207-218.
[20]	LARA A , KOLASANI A , Ramamurthy B . Network innovation using OpenFlow:a survey[J]. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2014,16(1): 493-512.
[21]	KREUTZ D , RAMOS F M V , VERISSIMO P E ,et al. Softwaredefined networking:A comprehensive survey[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2015,103(1): 14-76.
[22]	SYVERSON P , VANOORSCHOT P C . A unified cryptographic protocol logic[R]. Technical Report,NRL Publication 5540-227,Naval Research Lab, 1996.
[23]	HENDRIKX F , BUBENDORFER K , CHARD R . Reputation systems:A survey and taxonomy[J]. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 2015,75: 184-197.
[24]	SRIVATSA M , XIONG L , LIU L . TrustGuard:countering vulnerabilities in reputation management for decentralized overlay networks[C]// The 14th international conference on World Wide Web (WWW2005). Chiba,Japan, 2005.

Metrics

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

类型	无共谋无诽谤	无共谋有诽谤	有共谋无诽谤	有共谋有诽谤	均值
发送抵赖	0.250 0↘0.020 0	0.250 0↘0.019 0	0.250 0↘0.020 2	0.225 0↘0.019 6	0.243 8↘0.019 7
接收抵赖	0.233 3↘0.020 1	0.200 0↘0.019 0	0.177 3↘0.020 4	0.250 0↘0.020 2	0.215 2↘0.019 9
收发抵赖	0.016 7↘0	0.023 1↘0	0.010 0↘0	0.005 6↘0	0.013 9↘0
无抵赖	0.616 7↗0.957 7	0.610 0↗0.957 5	0.630 0↗0.957 2	0.625 0↗0.957 2	0.620 4↗0.957 4

类型	无共谋无诽谤		无共谋有诽谤		有共谋无诽谤		有共谋有诽谤		平均
类型	区间	均值	区间	均值	区间	均值	区间	均值	平均
抵赖查全率	0.025 6,0.812 5]	0.434 8	0.052 6,0.720 9]	0.334 8	0.052 6,0.766 7]	0.434 9	0.050 0,0.625 0]	0.287 4	0.373 0
抵赖查准率	0.875 0,1]	0.998 1	0.818 2,1 ]	0.999 6	0.702 7,1]	0.999 1	0.947 4,1 ]	0.999 9	0.999 2
调和平均值	0.050 0,0.896 6]	0.592 5	0.100 0,0.837 8]	0.490 1	0.095 2,0.867 9]	0.587 8	0.095 2,0.769 2]	0.435 0	0.526 4

抵赖抑制类别			无共谋无诽谤下交互总量					无共谋有诽谤下交互总量
抵赖抑制类别		100	500	1 000	2 000	10 000	100	500	1 000	2 000	10 000
	本文	0.380 0	0.250 0	0.185 0	0.108 5	0.022 1	0.270 0	0.256 0	0.184 0	0.104 0	0.021 2
源头抑制
	签邮	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000
	本文	0.020 0	0.022 0	0.015 0	0.003 5	0.001 2	0.050 0	0.012 0	0.007 0	0.006 0	0.000 1
事后抑制
	签邮	0.400 0	0.272 0	0.200 0	0.112 0	0.023 3	0.320 0	0.268 0	0.191 0	0.110 0	0.021 3
本文源头/签邮事后		95.00%	91.91%	92.5%	96.88%	94.85%	84.38%	95.52%	96.34%	94.55%	99.53%

抵赖抑制类别		有共谋无诽谤下交互总量					有共谋有诽谤下交互总量
抵赖抑制类别		100	500	1 000	2 000	10 000	100	500	1 000	2 000	10 000
	本文	0.290 0	0.232 0	0.180 0	0.106 0	0.021 7	0.240 0	0.260 0	0.176 0	0.109 0	0.021 9
源头抑制
	签邮	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000
	本文	0.120 0	0.034 0	0.004 0	0.003 0	0.000 2	0.050 0	0.026 0	0.011 0	0.002 5	0.000 2
事后抑制
	签邮	0.410 0	0.266 0	0.184 0	0.109 0	0.021 9	0.290 0	0.286 0	0.187 0	0.111 5	0.022 1
本文源头/签邮事后		70.73%	87.22%	97.83%	97.25%	99.09%	82.76%	90.91%	94.12%	97.76%	99.10%

SDN based e-mail repudiation source restraining method

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 24

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Recommended 0

[1]	Zhiyong LUO, Yu ZHANG, Qing WANG, Weiwei SONG. Study of SDN intrusion intent identification algorithm based on Bayesian attack graph [J]. Journal on Communications, 2023, 44(4): 216-225.
[2]	Jianzhong SU, Huayu ZHANG, Hailong ZHU. Computing method for periodic stream reservation in TSN combined with SDN controller [J]. Journal on Communications, 2021, 42(10): 23-31.
[3]	Yaomin WANG,Xia WANG,Yi DONG,Songhai ZHANG,Xinling SHI. Data center traffic scheduling strategy based on Fibonacci tree optimization algorithm [J]. Journal on Communications, 2020, 41(6): 112-127.
[4]	Zhenzhen HAN,Guofeng ZHAO,Chuan XU,Wentao ZHOU,Yangyang ZHOU. Dynamic SDN controller placement based on latency in LEO satellite network [J]. Journal on Communications, 2020, 41(3): 126-135.
[5]	Wenlong KE,Yong WANG,Miao YE,Junqi CHEN. Priority differentiated multicast flow scheduling method in Ceph cloud storage network [J]. Journal on Communications, 2020, 41(11): 40-51.
[6]	Hongyan QIAN,Hao XUE,Ming CHEN. UDM:NFV-based prevention mechanism against DDoS attack on SDN controller [J]. Journal on Communications, 2019, 40(3): 116-124.
[7]	Hui ZHAO, Liangmin WANG. Hybrid anonymous channel for recipient untraceability via SDN-based node obfuscation scheme [J]. Journal on Communications, 2019, 40(10): 55-66.
[8]	Tong DUAN,Julong LAN,Yuxiang HU,Hongwei FAN. Orchestration mechanism for VNF hardware acceleration resources in SDN/NFV architecture [J]. Journal on Communications, 2018, 39(6): 98-108.
[9]	Songjie WEI,Xin SUN,Rudong ZHAO,Chao WU. Tracing IP-spoofed packets in software defined network [J]. Journal on Communications, 2018, 39(11): 181-189.
[10]	Zhi-yuan ZHAO,Xiang-ru MENG,Yu-ze SU,Zhen-tao LI. Virtual SDN embedding with differentiated QoS under multiple controller [J]. Journal on Communications, 2017, 38(8): 101-110.
[11]	Zhi SUN,Ming CHEN. PriQoS:priority-differentiated flow control mechanism based on SDN [J]. Journal on Communications, 2017, 38(2): 115-124.
[12]	Tao WANG,Hong-chang CHEN,Guo-zhen CHENG. Research on software-defined network and the security defense technology [J]. Journal on Communications, 2017, 38(11): 133-160.
[13]	Jian WANG,Guo-sheng ZHAO,Zhi-xin LI. Research on mapping algorithm of virtual network oriented to SDN [J]. Journal on Communications, 2017, 38(10): 26-35.
[14]	Jun-fei LI,Ju-long LAN,Yu-xiang HU,Jiang-xing WU. Quantitative approach of multi-controller’s consensus in SDN [J]. Journal on Communications, 2016, 37(6): 86-93.
[15]	Zhe WANG,Man-gui LIANG,Xiao-meng JI,MateusAbisai Fillipus. Source-controlled OpenFlow data plane [J]. Journal on Communications, 2015, 36(3): 195-201.