面向移动社交网络内容分享的位置隐私保护方法

doi:10.11959/j.issn.1000-436x.2016212

Abstract

Abstract:

A privacy access control model for content sharing was presented to fine-grained control users' location infor-mation associated with sharing content in mobile social network. A k-anonymity privacy algorithm for privacy settings was given to protect against inference attack on a content sharing service provider server. To balance the privacy and quality of service, a location shifting method was presented. Finally experimental results demonstrate the validity and practicality of the proposed approach.

Key words: location privacy, privacy computing, privacy preservation, mobile social network

Chao LI,Li-hua YIN,Kui GENG,Bin-xing FANG. Location privacy preservation approach towards to content sharing on mobile online social network[J]. Journal on Communications, 2016, 37(11): 31-41.

Figures/Tables 7

References 33

[1]	ILIA p , POLAKIS I , ATHANASOPOULOS E . Face/Off: preventing privacy leakage from photos in social networks[C]// The 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. 2015:781-792.
[2]	NAINI F M , UNNIKRISHNAN J , THIRAN P . Where you are is who you are: user identification by matching statistics[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2016,11(2):358-372.
[3]	DATELINE NBC . Tracing a stalker[EB/OL]. , 2013.
[4]	VOELCKER J . Stalked by satellite: an alarming rise in gps-enabled harassment[J]. IEEE Spectrum, 2006,47(7):15-16.
[5]	WEBROOT SOFTWARE . Webroot survey finds geolocation apps prevalent amongst mobile device users, but 55\% concerned about loss of privacy[EB/OL]. , 2010.
[6]	Half of social networkers online concerned about privacy[EB/OL]. , 2010.
[7]	CHOW C Y , MOKBEL M F , LIU X , et al. A peer-to-peer spatial cloaking algorithm for anonymous location-based service[C]// The 14th Annual ACM International Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. 2006:171-178.
[8]	GRUTESER M , GRUNWALD D . Anonymous usage of location-based services through spatial and temporal cloaking[C]// The 1st International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications and Services. New York, USA: ACM, 2003:31-42.
[9]	KALNIS P , GHINITA G , MOURATIDIS K . Preventing location-based identity inference in anonymous spatial queries[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE, 2007,19(12):1719-1733.
[10]	GEDIK B , LIU L . Protecting location privacy with personalized k-anonymity: architecture and algorithms[J]. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, IEEE, 2008,7(1):1-18.
[11]	HU H , XU J , ON S T . Privacy-aware location data publishing[J]. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), ACM, 2010,35(3):1-40.
[12]	李凤华，李晖，贾焰 . 隐私计算研究范畴及发展趋势[J]. 通信学报, 2016,37(4):1-11. LI F H , LI H , JIA Y . Privacy computing: concept, connotation and its research trend[J]. Journal on Communications, 2016,37(4):1-11.
[13]	KRUMM J . A survey of computational location privacy[J]. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, London, UK, UK: Springer-Verlag, 2009,13(6):391-399.
[14]	BETTINI C , WANG X , JAJODIA S . Protecting privacy against location-based personal identification[J]. Secure Data Management, 2005,3674:185-199.
[15]	CHOW C Y , MOKBEL M F . Trajectory privacy in location-based services and data publication[C]// SIGKDD 2011,19-29.
[16]	DUCKHAM M , KULIK L . A formal model of obfuscation and negotiation for location privacy[J]. Pervasive Computing, 2005,3468:152-170.
[17]	DAMIANI M L . Privacy enhancing techniques for the protection of mobility patterns in LBS: research issues and trends[C]// European Data Protection: Coming of Age. Springer, 2013:223-239.
[18]	DAMIANI M , BERTINO E , SILVESTRI C . Protecting location privacy through semantics-aware obfuscation techniques[C]// IFIPTM, 2008:231-245.
[19]	KLEMPERER P , LIANG Y , MAZUREK M . Tag, you can see it!:using tags for access control in photo sharing[C]// The SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2012:377-386.
[20]	XU K , GUO Y , GUO L . My privacy my decision: control of photo sharing on online social networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 2015,(99):1.
[21]	WISHART R , CORAPI D , MARINOVIC S . Collaborative privacy policy authoring in a social networking context[C]// Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks. 2010 IEEE International Symposium. 2010:1-8.
[22]	WANG Y , ZHAI E , LUA E K . ISAC: Intimacy based access control for social network sites[C]// Ubiquitous Intelligence ＆ Computing and 9th International Conference on Autonomic ＆ Trusted Computing (UIC/ATC). 2012:517-524.
[23]	FONG P W L . Relationship-based access control: protection model and policy language[C]// The First ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy. 2011:191-202.
[24]	CARMINATI B , FERRARI E , PEREGO A . Enforcing access control in web-based social networks[J]. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC), 2009,13(1):6.
[25]	GATES C . Access control requirements for web 2.0 security and privacy[J]. IEEE Web, 2007,2.
[26]	HOUGHTON D J , JOINSON A N . Privacy, social network sites, and social relations[J]. Journal of Technology in Human Services, Taylor＆ Francis, 2010,28(1-2):74-94.
[27]	JOSHI J B , BERTINO E , LATIF U . A generalized temporal role-based access control model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2005,17(1):4-23.
[28]	GREENE K , DERLEGA V J , MATHEWS A . Self-disclosure in personal relationships[M]. The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships, 2006:409-427.
[29]	WIESE J , KELLEY P G , CRANOR L F . Are you close with me? are you nearby?: investigating social groups, closeness, and willingness to share[C]// The 13th international conference on Ubiquitous computing. 2011:197-206.
[30]	SUCH J M , ROVATSOS M . Privacy policy negotiation in social media[J]. ACM Trans Auton Adapt Syst, New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2016,11(1):4:1-4:29.
[31]	SWEENEY L . k-anonymity: a model for protecting privacy[J]. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 2002,10(7):557-570.
[32]	LIU Y , WEI W , SUN A . Exploiting geographical neighborhood characteristics for location recommendation[C]// The 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management - CIKM '14. 2014:739-748.
[33]	Real datasets for spatial databaes: road networks and points of Internet[EB/OL]. .

Metrics

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

		r₁= friend			r₂= family
l
l
	u₁	u₂	u₃	u₄	u₅	u₆
u₁	1	0.8	0.4	0	0.4	0.7
u₂	0.5	1	0.7	0	0.5	0.3

类型	Berlin	Chicago	London	S.F.
#users	5 510	13 852	17 112	21 591
#locations	15 528	38 505	63 466	66 142
#check-ins	238 972	490 998	942 877	1 545 407
avg.#check-ins/loc	15.39	12.75	14.86	23.36

Location privacy preservation approach towards to content sharing on mobile online social network

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 33

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Recommended 0

[1]	Tao PENG, Wentao ZHONG, Guojun WANG, Entao LUO, Jinbo XIONG, Yining LIU, Wang Hao. Privacy-preserving precise profile matching in mobile social network [J]. Journal on Communications, 2022, 43(11): 90-103.
[2]	Yan YAN, Yiming CONG, Mahmood Adnan, Quanzheng SHENG. Statistics release and privacy protection method of location big data based on deep learning [J]. Journal on Communications, 2022, 43(1): 203-216.
[3]	Hongtao LI, Xiaoyu REN, Jie WANG, Jianfeng MA. Continuous location privacy protection mechanism based on differential privacy [J]. Journal on Communications, 2021, 42(8): 164-175.
[4]	Chen FANG, Yuanbo GUO, Yifeng WANG, Yongjin HU, Jiali MA, Han ZHANG, Yangyang HU. Edge computing privacy protection method based on blockchain and federated learning [J]. Journal on Communications, 2021, 42(11): 28-40.
[5]	Ayong YE,Lingyu MENG,Ziwen ZHAO,Yiqing DIAO,Jiaomei ZHANG. Trajectory differential privacy protection mechanism based on prediction and sliding window [J]. Journal on Communications, 2020, 41(4): 123-133.
[6]	Jie WANG,Chunru WANG,Jianfeng MA,Hongtao LI. Dummy location selection algorithm based on location semantics and query probability [J]. Journal on Communications, 2020, 41(3): 53-61.
[7]	Zhu WANG,Kun HE,Xinyu WANG,Ben NIU,Fenghua LI. Traffic characteristic based privacy leakage assessment scheme for Android device [J]. Journal on Communications, 2020, 41(2): 155-164.
[8]	Weihao LI,Jin CAO,Hui LI. Privacy self-correlation privacy-preserving scheme in LBS [J]. Journal on Communications, 2019, 40(5): 57-66.
[9]	Wenjing ZHANG,Qiao LIU,Hui ZHU. Evaluation and protection of multi-level location privacy based on an information theoretic approach [J]. Journal on Communications, 2019, 40(12): 51-59.
[10]	Yuanzhi YAO,Feng WANG,Wenbo YAN,Nenghai YU. Image privacy preservation scheme based on QR code and reversible visible watermarking [J]. Journal on Communications, 2019, 40(11): 65-75.
[11]	Yatao YANG,Xinguang HAN,Jierun HUANG,Yang ZHAO. Bidirectional authentication key agreement protocol supporting identity’s privacy preservation based on RLWE [J]. Journal on Communications, 2019, 40(11): 180-186.
[12]	Weihao LI,Sheng DING,Jiajie MENG,Hui LI. Spatio-temporal aware privacy-preserving scheme in LBS [J]. Journal on Communications, 2018, 39(5): 134-142.
[13]	Xiaoying ZHANG,Hui PENG,Hong CHEN. State-of-the-art survey of privacy-preserving data aggregation in wireless sensor networks [J]. Journal on Communications, 2018, 39(10): 130-142.
[14]	Qian ZHOU,Xiaolin QIN,Youwei DING. Preserving source-location privacy efficiently based on attack-perceiving in wireless sensor network [J]. Journal on Communications, 2018, 39(1): 101-116.
[15]	Nan SHEN,Chun-fu JIA,Shuang LIANG,Rui-qi LI,Zhe-li LIU. Approach of location privacy protection based on order preserving encryption of the grid [J]. Journal on Communications, 2017, 38(7): 78-88.