[1] |
KORT F . Predicting Supreme court decisions mathematically:a quantitative analysis of the “right to counsel” cases[J]. American Political Science Review, 1957,51(1): 1-12.
|
[2] |
NAGEL S . Applying correlation analysis to case prediction[J]. Texas Law Review, 1964,42(7): 1006-1017.
|
[3] |
ULMER S S . Quantitative analysis of judicial processes:Some practical and theoretical applications[J]. Law and Contemporary Problems, 1963,28(1): 164.
|
[4] |
RINGQUIST E J , EMMERT C E . Judicial policymaking in published and unpublished decisions:the case of environmental civil ligaton[J]. Political Research Quarterly, 1999,52(1): 7-37.
|
[5] |
LAUDERDALE B E , CLARK T S . The supreme court’s many Median justices[J]. American Political Science Review, 2012,106(4): 847-866.
|
[6] |
LUO B F , FENG Y S , XU J B ,et al. Learning to predict charges for criminal cases with legal basis[C]// Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. [S.l]:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2017: 2727-2736.
|
[7] |
JIANG X , YE H , LUO Z C ,et al. Interpretable rationale augmented charge prediction system[C]// Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics:System Demonstrations. [S.l]:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018: 146-151.
|
[8] |
CHEN H J , CAI D , DAI W ,et al. Chargebased prison term prediction with deep gating network[C]// Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing. [S.l]:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019: 6362-6367.
|
[9] |
HU Z K , LI X , TU C C ,et al. Few-shot charge prediction with discriminative legal attributes[C]// Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics.[S.l.:s.n.], 2018: 487-498.
|
[10] |
ZHANG H , WANG X , TAN H Y ,et al. Applying data discretization to DPCNN for law article prediction[C]// Proceedings of the 8th CCF International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing. Heidelberg:Springer, 2019: 459-470.
|
[11] |
LONG S B , TU C C , LIU Z Y ,et al. Automatic judgment prediction via legal reading comprehension[J]. arXiv preprint,2018,arXiv:1809.06537.
|
[12] |
YANG W M , JIA W J , ZHOU X J ,et al. Legal judgment prediction via multiperspective bi-feedback network[C]// Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.[S.l.:s.n.], 2019: 4085-4091.
|
[13] |
YANG Z , WANG P F , ZHANG L ,et al. A recurrent attention network for judgment prediction[C]// Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Artificial Neural Network. Heidelberg:Springer, 2019: 253-266.
|
[14] |
ZHONG H X , WANG Y Z , TU C C ,et al. Iteratively questioning and answering for interpretable legal judgment prediction[C]// Proceedings of the 2020 AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Palo Alto:AAAI Press, 2020: 1250-1257.
|
[15] |
ZHONG H X , GUO Z P , TU C C ,et al. Legal judgment prediction via topological learning[C]// Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. [S.l.]:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018: 3540-3549.
|
[16] |
LI J J , ZHANG G Y , YAN H F ,et al. A Markov logic networks based method to predict judicial decisions of divorce cases[C]// Proceedings of 2018 IEEE International Conference on Smart Cloud. Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2018: 129-132.
|
[17] |
LIU Y H , CHEN Y L , HO W L . Predicting associated statutes for legal problems[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2015,51(1): 194-211.
|
[18] |
ZHONG H X , XIAO C J , TU C C ,et al. How does NLP benefit legal system:a summary of legal artificial intelligence[C]// Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. [S.l.]:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020: 5218-5230.
|