一种针对UnderMP3Cover的RS隐写分析新方法

doi:10.11959/j.issn.1000-0801.2018044

Abstract

Abstract:

A new RS steganalysis algorithm to attack UnderMP3Cover was proposed.By analyzing the error caused by the RS algorithm,the choice of resolution function,the initial bias and the fitting method were modified,the flip operator was also selected in the experiment.Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method can estimate the length of embedded message effectively and the average error reduces to 2%,which is better than the existing algorithms.

Key words: steganalysis, UnderMP3Cover, RS

CLC Number:

TP393

Jian ZHANG,Rangding WANG,Diqun YAN. A new RS steganalysis algorithm of detecting UnderMP3Cover[J]. Telecommunications Science, 2018, 34(4): 68-80.

Figures/Tables 22

References 15

[2]	WANG S , WANG L F , JIN H M ,et al. Big data application in net-work security analysis[J]. Telecommunications Science, 2015,31(7): 145-150
[3]	万威, 赵险峰, 黄炜 ,等. 基于码表分布特征和重编码的 MP3Stego隐写分析[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2012,29(1): 118-124.
	WAN W , ZHAO X F , HUANG W ,et al. Steganalysis of MP3Stego based on huffman table distribution and recoding[J]. Journal of the Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2012,29(1): 118-124.
[4]	万威 . MP3音频隐写分析技术研究[D]. 北京:中国科学院大学, 2011.
	WAN W . Research on MP3 audio steganalysis technology[D]. Beijing:Chinese Academy of Sciences University, 2011.
[5]	PETITCOLAS F A P . MP3Stego[EB]. 2002.
[6]	ACHMAD Z . MP3Stegz[EB]. 2007.
[7]	PLATT C . UnderMP3Cover[EB]. 2002.
[8]	FRIDRICH J , GOLJAN M , DU R . Detecting LSB steganography in color,and gray-scale images[J]. IEEE Multimedia, 2001,8(4): 22-28.
[9]	张涛, 平西建 . 基于差分直方图实现LSB信息伪装的可靠检测[J]. 软件学报, 2004,15(1): 151-158.
	ZHAN T , PING X J . Reliable detection of spatial LSB steganography based on difference histogram[J]. Journal of Software, 2004,15(1): 151-158.
[10]	JIN C , WANG R , YAN D ,et al. Steganalysis of UnderMP3Cover[J]. Journal of Computational Information Systems, 2012,8(24): 10459-10468.
[11]	KER A D , . Improved detection of LSB steganography in grayscale images[C]// International Conference on Information Hiding,May 19-21,2004,Santa Barbara,California,USA. Berlin:Springer, 2004: 97-115.
[12]	KER A D . Quantitative evaluation of pairs and RS steganalysis[J]. Proceedings of SPIE -The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2004(5306): 83-97.
[13]	LUO X , LIU B , LIU F . Improved RS method for detection of LSB steganography[C]// International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications,Dec 19-21,2008,Wuhan,China. Berlin:Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005: 508-516.
[14]	丁晋晶, 蒋铃鸽, 何晨 . 一种针对 LSB 嵌入方式水印的改进的全盲检测方案[J]. 高技术通讯, 2007,17(7): 681-685.
	DING J J , JIANG L G , HE C . An improved method of detecting LSB steganography[J]. Chinese High Technology Letters, 2007,17(7): 681-685.
[15]	于禛, 陈克非 . RS 检测算法的分析与改进[J]. 计算机工程, 2008,34(8): 170-171.
[1]	郑志彬 . 信息网络安全威胁及技术发展趋势[J]. 电信科学, 2009,25(2): 28-34.
	ZHENG Z B . Overview of mobile communication services se-curity[J]. Telecommunications Science, 2009,25(2): 28-34.
[2]	王帅, 汪来富, 金华敏 ,等. 网络安全分析中的大数据技术应用[J]. 电信科学, 2015,31(7): 145-150.
[15]	YU Z , CHEN K F . Analysis and improvement on RS detection algorithm[J]. Computer Engineering, 2008,34(8): 170-171.

Metrics

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

码率/（kbit·s^-1）	64	128	192	256
估计长度	4.46%	3.89%	3.41%	4.75%

码率/（kbit·s^-1）	64	128	192	256
x₀	0.006 1	0.003 2	0.002 7	0.004 7

码率/（kbit·s^-1）	64	128	192	256
x₀	-0.544 4	-0.510 6	0.156 7	-1.067 6

误差参数	拟合方式	R_-M	R_M	S_M	S_-M
SSE	直线	1.666×10^-5	1.682×10^-5	1.587 ×10^-5	1.055×10^-5
	二次曲线	1.6×10^-5	1.428×10^-5	9.187 ×10^-6	8.767×10^-6
R²	直线	99.93%	99.94%	99.94%	99.91%
	二次曲线	99.93%	99.95%	99.96%	99.93%

	拟合方式					嵌入率
	拟合方式	10%	20%	30%	40%	50%	60%	70%	80%	90%	100%
估计长度	未修正	9.09	20.40	30.32	40.30	51.35	61.01	71.07	80.67	90.51	98.44
	修正	8.66	20.00	29.97	40.00	51.10	60.81	70.93	80.57	90.46	98.43
中值误差	未修正	3.33	3.02	3.16	3.06	3.27	2.79	2.81	2.98	2.62	0.07
	修正	3.44	2.93	3.18	3.19	3.37	2.75	2.73	2.91	2.64	0.06

A new RS steganalysis algorithm of detecting UnderMP3Cover

RichHTML

PDF下载

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 22

References 15

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Recommended 0

码率/(kbit·s^-1)		检测方法					嵌入率
码率/(kbit·s^-1)		检测方法	10%	20%	30%	40%	50%	60%	70%	80%	90%	100%
64	估计长度	Jin算法	12.96	22.78	33.54	42.65	52.84	62.50	72.14	81.31	91.20	95.78
		本文算法	11.63	21.04	31.08	40.39	50.31	60.21	69.89	79.26	88.20	94.82
	中值误差	Jin算法	8.42	8.70	8.52	8.62	8.70	7.78	8.32	7.97	6.80	0.00
		本文算法	7.75	7.88	7.51	7.85	7.77	7.53	7.68	7.94	6.96	2.09
128	估计长度	Jin算法	12.30	22.48	33.67	43.69	52.64	62.39	71.60	80.74	91.28	97.23
		本文算法	10.96	20.98	31.11	40.94	50.11	59.95	69.50	78.87	89.45	96.28
	中值误差	Jin算法	6.44	6.63	6.67	6.58	5.98	5.88	5.65	5.50	5.76	0.00
		本文算法	5.88	6.10	6.09	6.26	5.73	5.70	5.70	5.32	5.78	1.25
192	估计长度	Jin算法	11.48	21.91	33.51	43.95	52.49	62.28	71.68	80.85	91.25	97.38
		本文算法	10.81	20.98	31.41	41.55	50.35	60.26	69.88	79.25	89.83	96.69
	中值误差	Jin算法	6.36	6.32	6.57	6.61	5.65	5.26	5.52	5.31	5.25	0.00
		本文算法	5.43	5.67	5.47	5.34	5.14	5.05	5.23	5.23	4.87	0.49
256	估计长度	Jin算法	13.29	23.73	34.89	44.05	53.38	62.82	71.87	80.97	90.93	97.16
		本文算法	10.90	21.16	31.50	40.69	50.53	60.15	69.47	78.82	89.24	96.45
	中值误差	Jin算法	6.78	7.14	6.86	6.83	6.56	6.25	5.84	5.86	5.59	0.00
		本文算法	5.97	5.58	5.55	5.42	5.45	5.36	5.17	5.17	5.01	1.29

[1]	Hui MA, Ruiqin WANG, Shuai YANG. A progressive growing of conditional generative adversarial networks model [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2023, 39(6): 105-113.
[2]	Min LU, Juan HU, Xianchao ZHANG, Weijian DING, Guangxue YUE. Personalized recommendation model based on users multi-features fusion [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2023, 39(5): 101-115.
[3]	Xiaoyun WANG, Wei DENG, Long ZHANG, Qi SUN. Research on multi-domain collaboration based method of TDD large-scale networking [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2023, 39(4): 43-51.
[4]	Min LU, Zehao QIN, Zhihui CHEN, Min ZHANG, Guangxue YUE. 1D-Concatenate based channel estimation DNN model optimization method [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2023, 39(4): 71-86.
[5]	Kehong A, Xiaodong HU. GAN data reconstruction based prediction method of telecom subscriber loss [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2023, 39(3): 135-142.
[6]	Yudi SUN. A prediction model of massive 5G network users’ revisit behavior based on telecom big data [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2023, 39(2): 157-162.
[7]	Ming WAN. Business model stakeholders and boundary reconstruction of 5GtoB [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2022, 38(Z1): 60-66.
[8]	Shaolong YANG, Yingshuang LIU, Yingqi WEI, Yue HUANG. Research on DNS implementation scheme of 5G enterprise private network [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2022, 38(Z1): 149-157.
[9]	Jiangxing WU. Revolution of the development paradigm of network technology system—network of networks [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2022, 38(6): 3-12.
[10]	Hao DONG, Liang SONG, Cunqing HUA, Lingya LIU, Junhua TANG. Survey of the research and development on the maritime communication technology [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2022, 38(5): 1-17.
[11]	Xinrong LYU, Youming LI, Yongqing WU, Xiaobo TANG. Receiver design of sparse Bayesian learning based MIMO-OFDM power line communication system [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2022, 38(2): 25-34.
[12]	Qing SHEN, Wenbin GUO, Jungang LOU, Qiangguo YU. Personalized recommendation model with multi-level latent features [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2022, 38(2): 71-83.
[13]	Peng ZHANG, Xiaoping JIN, Dongxiao CHEN. A genetic algorithm based method of optimizing dispersion matrix for RDSM system [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2022, 38(12): 46-55.
[14]	Weina ZHOU, Lu LIU. A real-time detection method for multi-scale ships in complex scenes [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2022, 38(10): 67-78.
[15]	Jian HU, Lei SUN, Yiyan YIN, Xiaokang YANG, Jingui BAI, Yejiang ZHANG. Research on 4G/5G voice quality optimization based on data mining and geographic visualization [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2022, 38(10): 131-139.

	拟合方式						嵌入率
	拟合方式	5%	10%	15%	20%	25%	30%	35%	40%	45%	50%
估计长度	未修正	4.22	9.35	15.02	20.53	26.54	32.21	37.65	43.19	48.43	52.80
	修正	3.84	8.91	14.59	20.13	26.17	31.87	37.33	42.91	48.17	52.57
中值误差	未修正	3.34	2.90	2.87	2.94	3.17	3.91	4.34	4.31	4.51	4.16
	修正	3.41	3.12	2.85	2.81	3.01	3.67	4.23	4.08	4.32	4.03

	拟合方式						嵌入率
	拟合方式	3.3%	6.6%	9.9%	13.2%	16.5%	19.8%	23.1%	26.4%	29.7%	33%
估计长度	未修正	2.66	5.74	7.82	11.21	14.80	18.32	21.84	25.29	28.91	34.66
	修正	2.13	4.69	9.38	12.85	16.61	20.23	24.09	27.52	31.21	32.38
中值误差	未修正	2.34	2.12	2.19	3.03	2.89	2.77	2.96	3.24	3.26	3.26
	修正	3.26	3.19	3.25	2.59	2.60	2.61	2.92	2.89	2.78	2.96

码率/(kbit·s^-1)		检测方法						嵌入率
码率/(kbit·s^-1)		检测方法	5%	10%	15%	20%	25%	30%	35%	40%	45%	50%
64	估计长度	Jin算法	8.67	12.65	17.28	22.02	27.44	32.53	37.45	42.60	47.52	51.92
		本文算法	7.78	11.96	16.57	21.12	26.26	31.28	36.24	40.78	45.82	50.29
	中值误差	Jin算法	5.00	8.89	8.66	8.82	8.97	8.89	8.13	8.36	8.16	7.77
		本文算法	5.00	8.05	8.31	7.77	8.00	7.85	7.38	7.48	7.66	7.04
128	估计长度	Jin算法	7.51	12.16	17.22	22.25	27.67	33.01	37.71	42.85	47.63	52.75
		本文算法	6.87	11.37	16.61	21.15	26.71	31.89	36.51	41.15	45.77	51.26
	中值误差	Jin算法	5.00	6.56	6.40	6.28	5.92	6.24	6.10	5.97	6.22	6.16
		本文算法	5.00	5.82	6.02	5.89	5.91	5.86	5.53	5.60	5.55	5.56
192	估计长度	Jin算法	6.73	11.51	16.74	21.69	26.88	32.62	37.64	42.38	47.10	52.21
		本文算法	6.61	11.33	16.46	21.15	26.33	31.87	36.68	41.09	45.77	50.95
	中值误差	Jin算法	5.00	5.94	6.01	6.12	5.99	5.64	5.50	5.96	5.27	5.76
		本文算法	5.00	5.77	5.56	5.51	5.66	5.09	4.93	5.25	4.86	5.26
256	估计长度	Jin算法	8.53	13.15	18.44	23.29	28.22	33.78	38.60	43.39	48.09	53.35
		本文算法	6.76	11.42	16.49	21.06	26.23	31.76	36.48	40.97	45.76	51.00
	中值误差	Jin算法	5.00	6.61	6.69	6.58	6.60	6.69	6.24	6.32	6.39	6.24
		本文算法	5.00	5.69	5.57	5.57	5.46	5.56	5.20	5.28	5.22	4.89

码率/(kbit·s^-1)		检测方法						嵌入率
码率/(kbit·s^-1)		检测方法	3.3%	6.6%	9.9%	13.2%	16.5%	19.8%	23.1%	26.4%	29.7%	33.0%
64	估计长度	Jin算法	7.42	9.82	13.00	16.03	18.77	21.96	25.49	29.12	31.86	35.02
		本文算法	6.46	8.73	11.49	14.59	17.39	20.44	23.89	27.49	30.03	33.19
	中值误差	Jin算法	3.30	6.60	8.80	8.83	8.11	8.89	8.12	8.62	8.12	8.23
		本文算法	3.30	6.60	8.13	7.49	7.50	7.73	7.70	7.78	7.10	7.72
128	估计长度	Jin算法	6.08	8.76	11.97	15.08	18.66	21.87	25.71	29.25	32.91	36.28
		本文算法	5.45	7.90	10.73	13.77	17.20	20.21	23.93	27.57	30.79	34.07
	中值误差	Jin算法	3.30	6.40	6.34	6.35	6.15	6.10	6.24	6.37	6.17	6.15
		本文算法	3.30	6.24	6.01	5.91	5.90	5.74	5.87	6.01	5.96	5.91
192	估计长度	Jin算法	5.61	8.34	11.44	14.92	18.25	21.64	25.56	29.09	33.19	36.74
		本文算法	5.27	7.81	10.70	14.01	17.25	20.47	24.10	27.62	31.33	34.76
	中值误差	Jin算法	3.30	6.13	6.26	6.20	5.71	6.11	6.66	6.21	6.47	6.45
		本文算法	3.30	5.38	5.28	5.57	5.14	4.97	5.39	5.71	5.23	5.54
256	估计长度	Jin算法	7.06	9.81	13.01	16.45	19.42	22.85	26.83	30.29	34.01	37.76
		本文算法	5.34	7.80	10.74	14.00	16.86	20.11	23.93	27.29	30.86	34.53
	中值误差	Jin算法	3.30	6.60	6.83	6.80	6.67	6.81	6.80	6.72	6.75	7.17
		本文算法	3.30	5.58	5.58	5.94	5.76	5.51	5.62	5.46	5.55	5.65