IMS核心网网络安全指标体系研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0801.2014.08.025

Telecommunications Science ›› 2014, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (8): 172-176.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0801.2014.08.025

• Operating technology wide-angle • Previous Articles

Research on IMS Core Network Security Index System

Qingnian Chen,Haoming Ou

Guangdong Branch of China Telecom Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510081, China

Online:2014-08-15 Published:2014-08-15

Abstract

Qingnian Chen,Haoming Ou. Research on IMS Core Network Security Index System[J]. Telecommunications Science, 2014, 30(8): 172-176.

Figures/Tables 3

References 2

Metrics

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

分类（4级）	指标名称（5级）	指标等级	指标值	指标评分/分	说明
容灾预评估指标	容灾主机组配置准确率	A	100.0%	100	各设备均按相关规范配置数据
	容灾倒换控制方式配置准确率	B	100.0%	100	各设备均按相关规范配置数据
	容灾倒回控制方式配置准确率	B	100.0%	100	各设备均按相关规范配置数据
	Bypass控制方式配置准确率	B	100.0%	100	各设备均按相关规范配置数据
	链路心跳检测启动率	A	85.3%	0	某个S-CSCF上未启动心跳检测，因此该指标评分为0
	链路心跳检测配置准确率	B	100.0%	100	各设备均按相关规范配置数据
	呼叫心跳检测配置准确率	B	100.0%	100	各设备均按相关规范配置数据
	S-CSCF 被叫号码补全数据配置准确率	B	100.0%	100	各设备均按相关规范配置数据
	容灾网关接管模式配置准确率	B	100.0%	100	各设备均按相关规范配置数据
	数据同步准确率	B	100.0%	100	各设备均按相关规范配置数据
容灾后评估指标	计费完好率	B	99.5%	99.5	CCF Bypass 期间共生成800张话单，出现4张异常话单
	设备容灾倒换时长	B	-	100	未发生容灾倒换
	设备容灾倒回时长	B	-	100	未发生容灾倒换
	设备容灾成功率	B	-	100	未发生容灾倒换
	设备Bypass成功率	B	100.0%	100	成功启动CCF Bypass
	用户license冗余率	B	100.0%	100	未发生用户数超过license

[1]	Le ZHANG, Hongyuan MA. Practice on edge cloud security of telecom operators [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2023, 39(4): 165-172.
[2]	Weixiong CHEN, Xiaochen YANG, Zengjun CHUN, Ruolan LI, Hua ZHANG. Research and practice of network security threat intelligence management system for power enterprise [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2022, 38(7): 184-189.
[3]	Yatian LIU, Bowen HU, Maofei CHEN, Dongxin LIU. Study on the 5GC security situational awareness system [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2022, 38(11): 73-85.
[4]	Yue GU, Dan LI, Kaihui GAO. Research on network traffic classification based on machine learning and deep learning [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2021, 37(3): 105-113.
[5]	Ming GAO,Jin LUO,Huiying ZHOU,Hai JIAO,Lili YING. A differential feedback scheduling decision algorithm based on mimic defense [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2020, 36(5): 73-82.
[6]	Yuanying XIAO,Yaodong YOU,Lixi XIANG. Causes and optimization of the false alarm rate of code review system [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2020, 36(12): 155-162.
[7]	Zhiqiang YANG,Li SU,Minpeng QI,Bo YANG. Overview and prospect of 5G security [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2020, 36(12): 1-19.
[8]	Guofeng HE. Application protection in 5G cloud network using zero trust architecture [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2020, 36(12): 123-132.
[9]	Ping XIE,Xiaosong LIU. Security of the deployment of SDN-based IoT using blockchain [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2020, 36(12): 139-146.
[10]	Hang YU,Shuai WANG,Huamin JIN. RASP based Web security detection method [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2020, 36(11): 113-120.
[11]	Junwen WANG. Technical requirement of future industrial internet [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2019, 35(8): 26-38.
[12]	Cong LI, Bo LEI, Chongfeng XIE, Yunhe LI. Trustworthy network based on blockchain technology [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2019, 35(10): 60-68.
[13]	Jianquan WANG,Zhangchao MA,Xinzhong LI,Lei SUN,Changwei HU. Quantum secure communication network architecture and mobile application solution [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2018, 34(9): 10-19.
[14]	. Interestmeasurement and system construction of personal information protectionLI Meiyan [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2018, 34(8): 160-166.
[15]	Qi LIANG. Security＆ safety protection solution of ICS [J]. Telecommunications Science, 2018, 34(4): 144-150.

Research on IMS Core Network Security Index System

RichHTML

PDF下载

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 3

References 2

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Recommended 0

1	3GPP TS 23.228. IP Multimedia Subsystem（IMS）, Stage 2, 2005
2	中国电信集团公司. 中国电信IMS网络技术体制, 2011